These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing. Tombu M; Jolicoeur P J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):795-810. PubMed ID: 15462621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism. Buetti S; Kerzel D Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks. Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions. Welsh TN Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference. Shin YK; Proctor RW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks. Hübner R; Lehle C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments. Vu KP; Proctor RW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2594-605. PubMed ID: 21887599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict? Wühr P; Kunde W J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective attention impairments in Alzheimer's disease: evidence for dissociable components. Levinoff EJ; Li KZ; Murtha S; Chertkow H Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):580-8. PubMed ID: 15291736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations. Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Zhang Y; Vu KP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):434-45. PubMed ID: 19271857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. Altmann EM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Gao T; Newman GE; Scholl BJ Cogn Psychol; 2009 Sep; 59(2):154-79. PubMed ID: 19500784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Richard AM; Lee H; Vecera SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 18665730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention. Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]