These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18665869)

  • 1. Electrophysiological evidence of feature-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials.
    Shin E; Wan XI; Fabiani M; Gratton G; Lleras A
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):804-11. PubMed ID: 18665869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional resources and pop-out detection in search displays.
    Schubö A; Schröger E; Meinecke C; Müller HJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1589-93. PubMed ID: 17885607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential and dipole modeling study.
    Fu S; Zinni M; Squire PN; Kumar R; Caggiano DM; Parasuraman R
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1345-55. PubMed ID: 18006335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological evidence for independent consolidation of multiple targets.
    Kihara K; Kawahara J; Takeda Y
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1493-6. PubMed ID: 18797304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accelerated and amplified neural responses in visual discrimination: Two features are processed faster than one.
    Lobaugh NJ; Chevalier H; Batty M; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):986-95. PubMed ID: 15961041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of feature and spatial attention on visual change detection.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 18303587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action.
    Hughes G; Waszak F
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1632-40. PubMed ID: 21352924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related brain potential evidence for implicit change detection: a replication of Fernandez-Duque et al. (2003).
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Ohira H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec; 448(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 18973794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competitive interaction degrades target selection: an ERP study.
    Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Sep; 46(5):1080-9. PubMed ID: 19497003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.
    Hilimire MR; Hickey C; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intramodal and crossmodal processing delays in the attentional blink paradigm revealed by event-related potentials.
    Ptito A; Arnell K; Jolicoeur P; Macleod J
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):794-803. PubMed ID: 18627533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Category-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials.
    Shin E; Bartholow BD
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Apr; 50(4):365-76. PubMed ID: 23351061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independence of speed and accuracy in visual search: evidence for separate mechanisms.
    Wilding J; Cornish K
    Child Neuropsychol; 2007 Nov; 13(6):510-21. PubMed ID: 17852132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.