BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18665870)

  • 1. ERP correlates of complex human decision making in a gambling paradigm: detection and resolution of conflict.
    Mennes M; Wouters H; van den Bergh B; Lagae L; Stiers P
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 18665870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition.
    Donkers FC; van Boxtel GJ
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 15518933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological correlates of decision-making in high-risk versus low-risk conditions of a gambling game.
    Yang J; Zhang Q
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1456-61. PubMed ID: 21913928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
    Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERP--correlates of response selection in a response conflict paradigm.
    Gajewski PD; Stoerig P; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():127-34. PubMed ID: 18053974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural mechanisms underlying conflict monitoring over risky decision alternatives: evidence from ERP in a Go/Nogo task.
    Wang S; Hui N; Zhou X; He K; Yu Y; Shuai J
    J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 13(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 25164361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related changes in cognitive conflict processing: an event-related potential study.
    Mager R; Bullinger AH; Brand S; Schmidlin M; Schärli H; Müller-Spahn F; Störmer R; Falkenstein M
    Neurobiol Aging; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1925-35. PubMed ID: 16973245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neural basis of risky decision-making in a blackjack task.
    Yang J; Li H; Zhang Y; Qiu J; Zhang Q
    Neuroreport; 2007 Sep; 18(14):1507-10. PubMed ID: 17712284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motor conflict in Stroop tasks: direct evidence from single-trial electro-myography and electro-encephalography.
    Szucs D; Soltész F; White S
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1960-73. PubMed ID: 19481157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling sequential effects of stimulus- and response-related conflict and stimulus-response repetition using brain potentials.
    Wendt M; Heldmann M; Münte TF; Kluwe RH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 19(7):1104-12. PubMed ID: 17583987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: an ERP study.
    Li P; Han C; Lei Y; Holroyd CB; Li H
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1129-33. PubMed ID: 21729102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain correlates of risky decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Sartori G; Rumiati R; Vidotto G; Daum I
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1886-94. PubMed ID: 19761850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanisms mediating parallel action monitoring in fronto-striatal circuits.
    Beste C; Ness V; Lukas C; Hoffmann R; Stüwe S; Falkenstein M; Saft C
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 22617828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feedback-related negativity effects vanished with false or monetary loss choice.
    Li P; Yuan J; Jia S; Feng T; Chen A; Li H
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):788-92. PubMed ID: 19381114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Perceptual conflict and response competition: event-related potentials of the stroop effect].
    Bekçi B; Karakaş S
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2009; 20(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 19504363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medial frontal cortex and response conflict: evidence from human intracranial EEG and medial frontal cortex lesion.
    Cohen MX; Ridderinkhof KR; Haupt S; Elger CE; Fell J
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1238():127-42. PubMed ID: 18760262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological evidence for reduced inhibitory control in depressed patients in partial remission: a Go/Nogo study.
    Ruchsow M; Groen G; Kiefer M; Beschoner P; Hermle L; Ebert D; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jun; 68(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 18313159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.