These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18666500)

  • 21. Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols.
    Medina AD; de Paula AB; de Fucio SB; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23338259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of LED curing modes on cusp deflection and hardness of composite restorations.
    Alomari QD; Mansour YF
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):684-9. PubMed ID: 16382590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of light-curing method and cement activation mode on resin cement knoop hardness.
    Tango RN; Sinhoreti MA; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Henriques GE
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):480-4. PubMed ID: 17760867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of light source and specimen thickness on the surface hardness of resin composite.
    Price RB; Dérand T; Loney RW; Andreou P
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 12074230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Composite resin microhardness: the influence of light curing method, composite shade, and depth of cure.
    de Araújo CS; Schein MT; Zanchi CH; Rodrigues SA; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 18473026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of light exposure time on composite resin hardness after root reinforcement using translucent fibre post.
    Teixeira CS; Silva-Sousa YC; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):520-8. PubMed ID: 18485559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Halogen and LED light curing of composite: temperature increase and Knoop hardness.
    Schneider LF; Consani S; Correr-Sobrinho L; Correr AB; Sinhoreti MA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Mar; 10(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 16402230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Siebrecht C; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12670072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of curing tip distance on resin composite Knoop hardness number, using three different light curing units.
    Caldas DB; de Almeida JB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA; Consani S
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 12760705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of the composite photoactivation mode on microtensile bond strength and Knoop microhardness.
    F e Silva AL; Pereira GD; Dias CT; Sartini Paulillo LA
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 16098575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
    Kamath U; Sheth H;
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro secondary caries inhibition by adhesive systems in enamel around composite restorations.
    Pinto CF; Paes-Leme AF; Ambrosano GM; Giannini M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 20533636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of polymerization technique on microleakage and microhardness of resin composite restorations.
    Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 12670077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Power distribution across the face of different light guides and its effect on composite surface microhardness.
    Vandewalle KS; Roberts HW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):108-17; discussion 118. PubMed ID: 18380841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of photoactivation systems and resin composites on the microleakage of esthetic restorations.
    Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Ambrosano GM; Ritter AV; Pimenta LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 17277829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of different light curing units on Knoop hardness and temperature of resin composite.
    Guiraldo RD; Consani S; Xediek Consani RL; Mendes WB; Lympius T; Coelho Sinhoreti MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 19884714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.