257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1866681)
1. Misconduct and fraud in research: social and legislative issues symposium of the Society of University Surgeons.
Simmons RL; Polk HC; Williams B; Mavroudis C
Surgery; 1991 Jul; 110(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 1866681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A view of misconduct in science.
Racker E
Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fraud and sloppiness in science.
Schmaus W
Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics and fraud in science: a review of scientific misconduct and applications to craniofacial research.
Eliades T; Athanasiou AE; Papadopulos JS
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 16164106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
US Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
Silverman S
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.
Greene PJ; Durch JS; Horwitz W; Hooper VS
IRB; 1986; 8(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11653742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Congressmen investigate scientific fraud.
Perspectives Prof; 1981; 1(3-4):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical considerations in bioengineering research.
Naurato N; Smith TJ
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():573-8. PubMed ID: 12724954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
Price AR
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
