These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18666881)

  • 1. Decision makers' perceptions of health technology decision making and priority setting at the institutional level.
    Gallego G; Fowler S; van Gool K
    Aust Health Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(3):520-7. PubMed ID: 18666881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision makers' perceptions of health technology decision making and priority setting at the institutional level.
    Dwyer AJ; Becker GJ; Hawkins C
    Aust Health Rev; 2010 Mar; 34(1):89. PubMed ID: 20387326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interests in health care technology assessment (HCTA) and HCTA training needs in eight European countries: COMETT-ASSESS.
    Szczepura A; Kankaanpää J
    Soc Sci Med; 1994 Jun; 38(12):1679-88. PubMed ID: 8047927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case study on determining and responding to health managers' priorities for research to assist health service decision making.
    Aldrich R; Bonevski B; Wilson A
    Aust Health Rev; 2006 Nov; 30(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 17073537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
    Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision making in acquiring medical technologies in Israeli medical centers: a preliminary study.
    Greenberg D; Pliskin JS; Peterburg Y
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2003; 19(1):194-201. PubMed ID: 12701951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Clinical Services Redesign Program in New South Wales: perceptions of senior health managers.
    Masso M; Robert G; McCarthy G; Eagar K
    Aust Health Rev; 2010 Aug; 34(3):352-9. PubMed ID: 20797369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resource allocation and health technology assessment in Australia: views from the local level.
    Gallego G; van Gool K; Kelleher D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 19331706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic evaluations of health technologies in Dutch healthcare decision-making: a qualitative study of the current and potential use, barriers, and facilitators.
    Roseboom KJ; van Dongen JM; Tompa E; van Tulder MW; Bosmans JE
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):89. PubMed ID: 28126005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers.
    Teng F; Mitton C; Mackenzie J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 7():84. PubMed ID: 17565691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public health decision-makers' informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence.
    Dobbins M; Jack S; Thomas H; Kothari A
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2007; 4(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 17850496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opportunity costs and local health service spending decisions: a qualitative study from Wales.
    Karlsberg Schaffer S; Sussex J; Hughes D; Devlin N
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Mar; 16():103. PubMed ID: 27012523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level -- the Israeli experience.
    Shani S; Siebzehner MI; Luxenburg O; Shemer J
    Health Policy; 2000 Dec; 54(3):169-85. PubMed ID: 11154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Setting priorities for high-cost medications in public hospitals in Australia: should the public be involved?
    Gallego G; Taylor SJ; Brien JA
    Aust Health Rev; 2011 May; 35(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21612733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?
    Ciani O; Tarricone R; Torbica A
    Health Policy; 2012 Dec; 108(2-3):194-202. PubMed ID: 23093020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction and uptake of new medical technologies in the Australian health care system: a qualitative study.
    Gallego G; Casey R; Norman R; Goodall S
    Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):152-8. PubMed ID: 21601934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.
    Wiseman V; Mooney G; Berry G; Tang KC
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 56(5):1001-12. PubMed ID: 12593873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Requirements for and expectations of health technology assessment in Galicia (Spain). A qualitative study from the perspective of decision-makers and clinicians].
    Varela-Lema L; Merino GA; García ML; Martínez MV; Triana EG; Mota TC
    Gac Sanit; 2011; 25(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 21820766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: a survey of key decision makers.
    Mitton C; Donaldson C
    Health Policy; 2002 Apr; 60(1):39-58. PubMed ID: 11879944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study.
    Singer PA; Martin DK; Giacomini M; Purdy L
    BMJ; 2000 Nov; 321(7272):1316-8. PubMed ID: 11090513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.