223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18667089)
1. A method for detecting epistasis in genome-wide studies using case-control multi-locus association analysis.
Gayán J; González-Pérez A; Bermudo F; Sáez ME; Royo JL; Quintas A; Galan JJ; Morón FJ; Ramirez-Lorca R; Real LM; Ruiz A
BMC Genomics; 2008 Jul; 9():360. PubMed ID: 18667089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting purely epistatic multi-locus interactions by an omnibus permutation test on ensembles of two-locus analyses.
Wongseree W; Assawamakin A; Piroonratana T; Sinsomros S; Limwongse C; Chaiyaratana N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 10():294. PubMed ID: 19761607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A random forest approach to the detection of epistatic interactions in case-control studies.
Jiang R; Tang W; Wu X; Fu W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S65. PubMed ID: 19208169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TEAM: efficient two-locus epistasis tests in human genome-wide association study.
Zhang X; Huang S; Zou F; Wang W
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i217-27. PubMed ID: 20529910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parallel and serial computing tools for testing single-locus and epistatic SNP effects of quantitative traits in genome-wide association studies.
Ma L; Runesha HB; Dvorkin D; Garbe JR; Da Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():315. PubMed ID: 18644146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GWIS--model-free, fast and exhaustive search for epistatic interactions in case-control GWAS.
Goudey B; Rawlinson D; Wang Q; Shi F; Ferra H; Campbell RM; Stern L; Inouye MT; Ong CS; Kowalczyk A
BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S10. PubMed ID: 23819779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cloud computing for detecting high-order genome-wide epistatic interaction via dynamic clustering.
Guo X; Meng Y; Yu N; Pan Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():102. PubMed ID: 24717145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting genome-wide epistases based on the clustering of relatively frequent items.
Xie M; Li J; Jiang T
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 22053078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. WISH-R- a fast and efficient tool for construction of epistatic networks for complex traits and diseases.
Carmelo VAO; Kogelman LJA; Madsen MB; Kadarmideen HN
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(1):277. PubMed ID: 30064383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-throughput analysis of epistasis in genome-wide association studies with BiForce.
Gyenesei A; Moody J; Semple CA; Haley CS; Wei WH
Bioinformatics; 2012 Aug; 28(15):1957-64. PubMed ID: 22618535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying quantitative trait locus by genetic background interactions in association studies.
Jannink JL
Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):553-61. PubMed ID: 17179077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imperfect Linkage Disequilibrium Generates Phantom Epistasis (& Perils of Big Data).
de Los Campos G; Sorensen DA; Toro MA
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1429-1436. PubMed ID: 30877081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HiSSI: high-order SNP-SNP interactions detection based on efficient significant pattern and differential evolution.
Cao X; Liu J; Guo M; Wang J
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 7):139. PubMed ID: 31888641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel evolution-based method for detecting gene-gene interactions.
Rao S; Yuan M; Zuo X; Su W; Zhang F; Huang K; Lin M; Ding Y
PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26435. PubMed ID: 22046286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multifactor dimensionality reduction for graphics processing units enables genome-wide testing of epistasis in sporadic ALS.
Greene CS; Sinnott-Armstrong NA; Himmelstein DS; Park PJ; Moore JH; Harris BT
Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 26(5):694-5. PubMed ID: 20081222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SNPHarvester: a filtering-based approach for detecting epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies.
Yang C; He Z; Wan X; Yang Q; Xue H; Yu W
Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 25(4):504-11. PubMed ID: 19098029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prioritizing tests of epistasis through hierarchical representation of genomic redundancies.
Cowman T; Koyutürk M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Aug; 45(14):e131. PubMed ID: 28605458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting multi-way epistasis in family-based association studies.
Loucoubar C; Grant AV; Bureau JF; Casademont I; Bar NA; Bar-Hen A; Diop M; Faye J; Sarr FD; Badiane A; Tall A; Trape JF; Cliquet F; Schwikowski B; Lathrop M; Paul RE; Sakuntabhai A
Brief Bioinform; 2017 May; 18(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 27178992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An efficient algorithm to perform multiple testing in epistasis screening.
Van Lishout F; Mahachie John JM; Gusareva ES; Urrea V; Cleynen I; Théâtre E; Charloteaux B; Calle ML; Wehenkel L; Van Steen K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 14():138. PubMed ID: 23617239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. iLOCi: a SNP interaction prioritization technique for detecting epistasis in genome-wide association studies.
Piriyapongsa J; Ngamphiw C; Intarapanich A; Kulawonganunchai S; Assawamakin A; Bootchai C; Shaw PJ; Tongsima S
BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S2. PubMed ID: 23281813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
