These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18667335)

  • 1. Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning.
    Wan L; Dienes Z; Fu X
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1209-18. PubMed ID: 18667335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prior familiarity with components enhances unconscious learning of relations.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):413-8. PubMed ID: 20096605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1264-88. PubMed ID: 18763904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):372-88. PubMed ID: 19932473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Independent judgment-linked and motor-linked forms of artificial grammar learning.
    Seger CA
    Conscious Cogn; 1998 Jun; 7(2):259-84. PubMed ID: 9690029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.
    Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.
    Shanks DR; Johnstone T; Staggs L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):216-52. PubMed ID: 9080793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge applied to new domains: the unconscious succeeds where the conscious fails.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):391-8. PubMed ID: 20007018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploration of implicit artificial grammar learning in Parkinson's disease.
    Peigneux P; Meulemans T; Van der Linden M; Salmon E; Petit H
    Acta Neurol Belg; 1999 Jun; 99(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 10427353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit preferences: the role(s) of familiarity in the structural mere exposure effect.
    Zizak DM; Reber AS
    Conscious Cogn; 2004 Jun; 13(2):336-62. PubMed ID: 15134764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explicit feedback maintains implicit knowledge.
    Mealor AD; Dienes Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):822-32. PubMed ID: 23770696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual strategies in artificial grammar learning.
    Visser I; Raijmakers ME; Pothos EM
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):293-307. PubMed ID: 19827700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring strategic control in artificial grammar learning.
    Norman E; Price MC; Jones E
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1920-9. PubMed ID: 21824790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit learning and reading: insights from typical children and children with developmental dyslexia using the artificial grammar learning (AGL) paradigm.
    Pavlidou EV; Williams JM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1457-72. PubMed ID: 24751907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of retention intervals on receiver operating characteristics in artificial grammar learning.
    Tunney RJ; Bezzina G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 16899208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory.
    Thadeus Meeks J; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):997-1004. PubMed ID: 17052920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autobiographical elaboration reduces memory distortion: cognitive operations and the distinctiveness heuristic.
    McDonough IM; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1430-45. PubMed ID: 18980406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial grammar learning in pigeons.
    Herbranson WT; Shimp CP
    Learn Behav; 2008 May; 36(2):116-37. PubMed ID: 18543712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in the types of musical regularity learnt in incidental- and intentional-learning conditions.
    Kuhn G; Dienes Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1725-44. PubMed ID: 16945857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.