313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18667400)
1. Assessment of patient organ doses and effective doses using the VIP-Man adult male phantom for selected cone-beam CT imaging procedures during image guided radiation therapy.
Gu J; Bednarz B; Xu XG; Jiang SB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 18667400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT.
Walter C; Boda-Heggemann J; Wertz H; Loeb I; Rahn A; Lohr F; Wenz F
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18023491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination.
Staton RJ; Lee C; Lee C; Williams MD; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5151-66. PubMed ID: 17019030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mega-voltage versus kilo-voltage cone beam CT used in image guided radiation therapy: comparative study of microdosimetric properties.
Qiu Y; Popescu IA; Duzenli C; Moiseenko V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Feb; 143(2-4):477-80. PubMed ID: 21148588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beam characteristics and radiation output of a kilovoltage cone-beam CT.
Ding GX; Coffey CW
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5231-48. PubMed ID: 20714042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning.
Thomas TH; Devakumar D; Purnima S; Ravindran BP
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2067-77. PubMed ID: 19287087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose calculation on kV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the Hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration.
Rong Y; Smilowitz J; Tewatia D; Tomé WA; Paliwal B
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 19931031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anthropometric approaches and their uncertainties to assigning computational phantoms to individual patients in pediatric dosimetry studies.
Whalen S; Lee C; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):453-71. PubMed ID: 18184999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose reduction for kilovotage cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy.
Wang J; Li T; Liang Z; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(11):2897-909. PubMed ID: 18460749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo simulations for external neutron dosimetry based on the visible Chinese human phantom.
Zhang G; Liu Q; Luo Q
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(24):7367-83. PubMed ID: 18065844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Megavoltage cone beam digital tomosynthesis (MV-CBDT) for image-guided radiotherapy: a clinical investigational system.
Pang G; Bani-Hashemi A; Au P; O'Brien PF; Rowlands JA; Morton G; Lim T; Cheung P; Loblaw A
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):999-1013. PubMed ID: 18263954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Personalized assessment of kV cone beam computed tomography doses in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric cancer patients.
Zhang Y; Yan Y; Nath R; Bao S; Deng J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22285667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of computed tomography dose index in cone beam computed tomography: MOSFET measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Kim S; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF; Frush D
Health Phys; 2010 May; 98(5):683-91. PubMed ID: 20386198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT.
Huda W; Vance A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):540-6. PubMed ID: 17242266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation exposure to patients from image guidance procedures and techniques to reduce the imaging dose.
Ding GX; Munro P
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Jul; 108(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 23830468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voxel phantoms: NORMAN vs. VIP-Man, what differences are there?
Kramer GH; Capello K; Cardenas-Mendez E
Health Phys; 2009 Feb; 96(2 Suppl):S22-6. PubMed ID: 19125052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of protective patient equipment for CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Ott B; Stüssi A; Mini R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):213-21. PubMed ID: 20829205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Specific absorbed fraction for Korean adult voxel phantom from internal photon source.
Lee C; Park S; Lee JK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 17110390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
