288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18667444)
1. An HMM approach to genome-wide identification of differential histone modification sites from ChIP-seq data.
Xu H; Wei CL; Lin F; Sung WK
Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2344-9. PubMed ID: 18667444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying differential histone modification sites from ChIP-seq data.
Xu H; Sung WK
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 802():293-303. PubMed ID: 22130888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genome-wide epigenetic analysis of human pluripotent stem cells by ChIP and ChIP-Seq.
Hitchler MJ; Rice JC
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 767():253-67. PubMed ID: 21822881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genome-wide analysis of histone modifications by ChIP-on-chip.
Huebert DJ; Kamal M; O'Donovan A; Bernstein BE
Methods; 2006 Dec; 40(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 17101450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A signal-noise model for significance analysis of ChIP-seq with negative control.
Xu H; Handoko L; Wei X; Ye C; Sheng J; Wei CL; Lin F; Sung WK
Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(9):1199-204. PubMed ID: 20371496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitatively profiling genome-wide patterns of histone modifications in Arabidopsis thaliana using ChIP-seq.
Luo C; Lam E
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1112():177-93. PubMed ID: 24478015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer and statistical analysis of transcription factor binding and chromatin modifications by ChIP-seq data in embryonic stem cell.
Orlov Y; Xu H; Afonnikov D; Lim B; Heng JC; Yuan P; Chen M; Yan J; Clarke N; Orlova N; Huss M; Gunbin K; Podkolodnyy N; Ng HH
J Integr Bioinform; 2012 Sep; 9(2):211. PubMed ID: 22987856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrative analyses for omics data: a Bayesian mixture model to assess the concordance of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq measurements.
Schäfer M; Lkhagvasuren O; Klein HU; Elling C; Wüstefeld T; Müller-Tidow C; Zender L; Koschmieder S; Dugas M; Ickstadt K
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2012; 75(8-10):461-70. PubMed ID: 22686305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability of histone modifications across mammalian genomes: implications for 'epigenetic' marking.
Lee BM; Mahadevan LC
J Cell Biochem; 2009 Sep; 108(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19623574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing genome-wide chromatin profiles using ChIP-chip or ChIP-seq.
Johannes F; Wardenaar R; Colomé-Tatché M; Mousson F; de Graaf P; Mokry M; Guryev V; Timmers HT; Cuppen E; Jansen RC
Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 26(8):1000-6. PubMed ID: 20208068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A high-resolution whole-genome map of the distinctive epigenomic landscape induced by butyrate in bovine cells.
Shin JH; Xu L; Li RW; Gao Y; Bickhart D; Liu GE; Baldwin R; Li CJ
Anim Genet; 2014 Aug; 45 Suppl 1():40-50. PubMed ID: 24990294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol for histone modifications and protein-DNA binding analyses in Arabidopsis.
Pien S; Grossniklaus U
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 631():209-20. PubMed ID: 20204877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Native chromatin immunoprecipitation (N-ChIP) and ChIP-Seq of Schistosoma mansoni: Critical experimental parameters.
Cosseau C; Azzi A; Smith K; Freitag M; Mitta G; Grunau C
Mol Biochem Parasitol; 2009 Jul; 166(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 19428675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computationally Tractable Multivariate HMM in Genome-Wide Mapping Studies.
Choi H; Ghosh D; Qin Z
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1552():135-148. PubMed ID: 28224496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Co-ChIP enables genome-wide mapping of histone mark co-occurrence at single-molecule resolution.
Weiner A; Lara-Astiaso D; Krupalnik V; Gafni O; David E; Winter DR; Hanna JH; Amit I
Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):953-61. PubMed ID: 27454738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mapping protein-DNA interactions using ChIP-sequencing.
Massie CE; Mills IG
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 809():157-73. PubMed ID: 22113275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo epigenomic profiling of germ cells reveals germ cell molecular signatures.
Ng JH; Kumar V; Muratani M; Kraus P; Yeo JC; Yaw LP; Xue K; Lufkin T; Prabhakar S; Ng HH
Dev Cell; 2013 Feb; 24(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 23352811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fully Bayesian hidden Ising model for ChIP-seq data analysis.
Mo Q
Biostatistics; 2012 Jan; 13(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 21914728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. histoneHMM: Differential analysis of histone modifications with broad genomic footprints.
Heinig M; Colomé-Tatché M; Taudt A; Rintisch C; Schafer S; Pravenec M; Hubner N; Vingron M; Johannes F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():60. PubMed ID: 25884684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epigenetic domains found in mouse embryonic stem cells via a hidden Markov model.
Larson JL; Yuan GC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 11():557. PubMed ID: 21073706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
