These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18668082)

  • 1. Digital identifiers could keep up with authors' moves.
    Aerts R
    Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7204):575. PubMed ID: 18668082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital identifiers work for articles, so why not for authors?
    Aerts R
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):979. PubMed ID: 18563129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chinese reviewers: sign up for unique IDs, please.
    Muñoz-Pinedo C
    Nature; 2019 Jan; 565(7738):161. PubMed ID: 30626954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Give south Indian authors their true names.
    Puniamoorthy N; Jeevanandam J; Narayanan Kutty S
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7187):530. PubMed ID: 18385711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fallacy of double-blinded peer review.
    Liebeskind DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1422; author reply 1422-3. PubMed ID: 14573448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manuscripts: to blind, or not to blind, that is the question.
    Rogers LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1373. PubMed ID: 12438019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ratings games.
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7053):889-90. PubMed ID: 16107794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
    Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
    Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
    Naqvi KR
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields.
    Lane D
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reviewing should be shown in publication list.
    Clausen T; Nielsen OB
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chinese authors' names should include their names in Chinese.
    Cheng TO
    Int J Cardiol; 2008 Jan; 123(2):169. PubMed ID: 17174422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige.
    Okike K; Hug KT; Kocher MS; Leopold SS
    JAMA; 2016 Sep; 316(12):1315-6. PubMed ID: 27673310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific publishing. Are you ready to become a number?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5922):1662-4. PubMed ID: 19325094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The taint of 'misbehavior'.
    Guterman L
    Chron High Educ; 2006 Feb; 52(25):A14-6. PubMed ID: 16786618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic and open identification of researchers and authors: focus on open researcher and contributor ID.
    Gasparyan AY; Akazhanov NA; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Nov; 29(11):1453-6. PubMed ID: 25408574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protecting authors?
    Mohapatra PR
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):155. PubMed ID: 19004153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research papers should omit their authors' affiliations.
    Harris M
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6439. PubMed ID: 25368392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.