152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18668630)
1. Soft tissue anatomy around the hip and its implications for choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing.
Ansari Moein CM; Verhofstad MH; Bleys RL; van der Werken C
Clin Anat; 2008 Sep; 21(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 18668630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip.
Ansari Moein CM; Verhofstad MH; Bleys RL; van der Werken C
Injury; 2005 Nov; 36(11):1337-42. PubMed ID: 16137692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lateral insertion points in antegrade femoral nailing and their influence on femoral bone strains.
Linke B; Ansari Moein C; Bösl O; Verhofstad MH; van der Werken C; Schwieger K; Ito K
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):716-22. PubMed ID: 18978548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.
Ricci WM; Schwappach J; Tucker M; Coupe K; Brandt A; Sanders R; Leighton R
J Orthop Trauma; 2006; 20(10):663-7. PubMed ID: 17106375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures.
Helmy N; Jando VT; Lu T; Chan H; O'Brien PJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18176159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femoral bone strains during antegrade nailing: a comparison of two entry points with identical nails using finite element analysis.
Tupis TM; Altman GT; Altman DT; Cook HA; Miller MC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 May; 27(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 22137147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing.
Ostrum RF; Marcantonio A; Marburger R
J Orthop Trauma; 2005; 19(10):681-6. PubMed ID: 16314714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing.
Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA
Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intramedullary femoral nailing through the trochanteric fossa versus greater trochanter tip: a randomized controlled study with in-depth functional outcome results.
Ansari Moein CM; Ten Duis HJ; Oey PL; de Kort GA; van der Meulen W; van der Werken C
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 26815474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trochanteric fossa or piriform fossa of the femur: time for standardised terminology?
Ansari Moein CM; Gerrits PD; ten Duis HJ
Injury; 2013 Jun; 44(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 23026115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Closed intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the femur. Problems related to anatomical variations of the greater trochanter.
Antonelli L
Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1989 Mar; 15(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 2737894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there a gluteus medius tendon injury during reaming through a modified medial trochanteric portal? A cadaver study.
Perez EA; Jahangir AA; Mashru RP; Russell TA
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Oct; 21(9):617-20. PubMed ID: 17921836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of antegrade femoral nailing on femoral head perfusion: a comparison of piriformis fossa and trochanteric entry points.
Schottel PC; Hinds RM; Lazaro LE; Klinger C; Ni A; Dyke JP; Helfet DL; Lorich DG
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 25708026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomy of the greater trochanteric 'bald spot': a potential portal for abductor sparing femoral nailing?
Gardner MJ; Robertson WJ; Boraiah S; Barker JU; Lorich DG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 466(9):2196-200. PubMed ID: 18347886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Entry point soft tissue damage in antegrade femoral nailing: a cadaver study.
Dora C; Leunig M; Beck M; Rothenfluh D; Ganz R
J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11602831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional outcome after antegrade femoral nailing: a comparison of trochanteric fossa versus tip of greater trochanter entry point.
Ansari Moein C; ten Duis HJ; Oey L; de Kort G; van der Meulen W; Vermeulen K; van der Werken C
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Apr; 25(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 21399467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomy of the greater femoral trochanter: clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing. Anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens.
Grechenig W; Pichler W; Clement H; Tesch NP; Grechenig S
Acta Orthop; 2006 Dec; 77(6):899-901. PubMed ID: 17260198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Greater trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry nails for femur shaft fractures: Resolving the controversy.
Kumar P; Neradi D; Kansal R; Aggarwal S; Kumar V; Dhillon MS
Injury; 2019 Oct; 50(10):1715-1724. PubMed ID: 31358301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An anatomical study of the entry point in the greater trochanter for intramedullary nailing.
Farhang K; Desai R; Wilber JH; Cooperman DR; Liu RW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Sep; 96-B(9):1274-81. PubMed ID: 25183603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a standard trochanteric entry site for nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures?
Streubel PN; Wong AH; Ricci WM; Gardner MJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Apr; 25(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 21399468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
