These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18670053)
1. Kilovoltage x-ray dosimetry--an experimental comparison between different dosimetry protocols. Munck af Rosenschöld P; Nilsson P; Knöös T Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4431-42. PubMed ID: 18670053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements. Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between absorbed dose to water standards established by water calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB and by application of international air-kerma based protocols for kilovoltage medium energy x-rays. Perichon N; Rapp B; Denoziere M; Daures J; Ostrowsky A; Bordy JM Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(9):2787-806. PubMed ID: 23563051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Araki F; Kubo HD Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements. González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dosimetric evaluation of water equivalent phantoms for kilovoltage x-ray beams. Hill R; Holloway L; Baldock C Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):N331-44. PubMed ID: 16237233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols. Peixoto JG; Andreo P Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):563-75. PubMed ID: 10730957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams. Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study. Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The new NMi orthovolt x-rays absorbed dose to water primary standard based on water calorimetry. de Prez LA; de Pooter JA Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3531-42. PubMed ID: 18552419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data for the dosimetry of low- and medium-energy kV x rays. Andreo P Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(20):205019. PubMed ID: 31491771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo and Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo calculations of beam quality correction factors kQ for electron dosimetry with a parallel-plate Roos chamber. Zink K; Wulff J Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1595-607. PubMed ID: 18367790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water. Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of small static fields used in external photon beam radiotherapy: Summary of TRS-483, the IAEA-AAPM international Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination. Palmans H; Andreo P; Huq MS; Seuntjens J; Christaki KE; Meghzifene A Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1123-e1145. PubMed ID: 30247757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of the formalism used to determine the absorbed dose for low-energy x-ray beams. Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6963-77. PubMed ID: 19001702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL). Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE; Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration of helical tomotherapy machine using EPR/alanine dosimetry. Perichon N; Garcia T; François P; Lourenço V; Lesven C; Bordy JM Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1168-77. PubMed ID: 21520829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]