198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18670053)
1. Kilovoltage x-ray dosimetry--an experimental comparison between different dosimetry protocols.
Munck af Rosenschöld P; Nilsson P; Knöös T
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4431-42. PubMed ID: 18670053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between absorbed dose to water standards established by water calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB and by application of international air-kerma based protocols for kilovoltage medium energy x-rays.
Perichon N; Rapp B; Denoziere M; Daures J; Ostrowsky A; Bordy JM
Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(9):2787-806. PubMed ID: 23563051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dosimetric evaluation of water equivalent phantoms for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
Hill R; Holloway L; Baldock C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):N331-44. PubMed ID: 16237233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols.
Peixoto JG; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):563-75. PubMed ID: 10730957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA
Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The new NMi orthovolt x-rays absorbed dose to water primary standard based on water calorimetry.
de Prez LA; de Pooter JA
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3531-42. PubMed ID: 18552419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data for the dosimetry of low- and medium-energy kV x rays.
Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(20):205019. PubMed ID: 31491771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry intercomparison using a 35-keV X-ray synchrotron beam.
Oves SD; Hogstrom KR; Ham K; Sajo E; Dugas JP
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S121-5. PubMed ID: 18586431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo and
Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo calculations of beam quality correction factors kQ for electron dosimetry with a parallel-plate Roos chamber.
Zink K; Wulff J
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1595-607. PubMed ID: 18367790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of small static fields used in external photon beam radiotherapy: Summary of TRS-483, the IAEA-AAPM international Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination.
Palmans H; Andreo P; Huq MS; Seuntjens J; Christaki KE; Meghzifene A
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1123-e1145. PubMed ID: 30247757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of the formalism used to determine the absorbed dose for low-energy x-ray beams.
Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6963-77. PubMed ID: 19001702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).
Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE;
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration of helical tomotherapy machine using EPR/alanine dosimetry.
Perichon N; Garcia T; François P; Lourenço V; Lesven C; Bordy JM
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1168-77. PubMed ID: 21520829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
