201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18670852)
41. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for the initial evaluation of cervical node level of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison with ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT.
Jeong HS; Baek CH; Son YI; Choi JY; Kim HJ; Ko YH; Chung JH; Baek HJ
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2006 Sep; 65(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 16918964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preoperative intrathoracic lymph node staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography.
Billé A; Pelosi E; Skanjeti A; Arena V; Errico L; Borasio P; Mancini M; Ardissone F
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Sep; 36(3):440-5. PubMed ID: 19464906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. STIR turbo SE MR imaging vs. coregistered FDG-PET/CT: quantitative and qualitative assessment of N-stage in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Nogami M; Takenaka D; Yoshikawa T; Yoshimura M; Ohbayashi C; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1071-80. PubMed ID: 17896365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Significance of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET imaging in evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer].
Hu M; Yu JM; Liu NB; Liu LP; Guo HB; Yang GR; Zhang PL; Xu XQ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 30(4):306-9. PubMed ID: 18788639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prospective comparison of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in patients with melanoma with palpable lymph node metastases: diagnostic accuracy and impact on treatment.
Bastiaannet E; Wobbes T; Hoekstra OS; van der Jagt EJ; Brouwers AH; Koelemij R; de Klerk JM; Oyen WJ; Meijer S; Hoekstra HJ
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 27(28):4774-80. PubMed ID: 19720925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Usefulness of non attenuation corrected 18F-FDG-PET images for optimal assessment of disease activity in patients with lymphoma.
Houseni M; Chamroonrat W; Basu S; Bural G; Mavi A; Kumar R; Alavi A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 19330173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of variation in relaxation parameter value on LOR-RAMLA reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET studies.
Groheux D; Martineau A; Vrigneaud JM; Hindie E; Baillet G; Moretti JL
Nucl Med Commun; 2009 Dec; 30(12):926-33. PubMed ID: 19574939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Validation of fast-RAMLA in clinical PET.
Sato H; Cho K; Fukushima Y; Shiiba M; Hakozaki K; Kiriyama T; Sakurai M; Kanaya K; Kumita S
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Dec; 22(10):869-76. PubMed ID: 19142705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Impact of [¹⁸F]FDG PET imaging parameters on automatic tumour delineation: need for improved tumour delineation methodology.
Cheebsumon P; Yaqub M; van Velden FH; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Dec; 38(12):2136-44. PubMed ID: 21858528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Usefulness of noise adaptive non-linear gaussian filter in FDG-PET study.
Nagayoshi M; Murase K; Fujino K; Uenishi Y; Kawamata M; Nakamura Y; Kitamura K; Higuchi I; Oku N; Hatazawa J
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 19(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 16248383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Improved quantitation for PET/CT image reconstruction with system modeling and anatomical priors.
Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4095-103. PubMed ID: 17153389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in endometrial cancer.
Lee SI; Russell AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):W210. PubMed ID: 18941059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. A phantom for investigation of tumour signal and noise in PET reconstruction with various smoothing filters: experiments and comparisons with simulated intensity diffusion.
Skretting A; Glomset O; Bogsrud TV
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):191-4. PubMed ID: 20176733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Visualization of small brain nuclei with a high-spatial resolution, clinically available whole-body PET scanner.
Shinohara Y; Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 38(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 37989801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A hybrid algorithm for PET/CT image merger in hybrid scanners.
Kennedy JA; Israel O; Frenkel A; Bar-Shalom R; Azhari H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Apr; 34(4):517-31. PubMed ID: 17115215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Which FDG/PET parameters of the primary tumors in colon or sigmoid cancer provide the best correlation with the pathological findings?
Chen SW; Chen WT; Wu YC; Yen KY; Hsieh TC; Lin TY; Kao CH
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):e405-10. PubMed ID: 23759516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Improvement in PET/CT image quality in overweight patients with PSF and TOF.
Taniguchi T; Akamatsu G; Kasahara Y; Mitsumoto K; Baba S; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Mikasa S; Kidera D; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 25258046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Influence of reconstruction settings on the performance of adaptive thresholding algorithms for FDG-PET image segmentation in radiotherapy planning.
Matheoud R; Della Monica P; Loi G; Vigna L; Krengli M; Inglese E; Brambilla M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 12(2):3363. PubMed ID: 21587182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET.
Yan J; Chu-Shern JL; Loi HY; Khor LK; Sinha AK; Quek ST; Tham IW; Townsend D
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1667-73. PubMed ID: 26229145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
