1289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18672632)
1. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?
Ercan S; Rice TW; Murthy SC; Rybicki LA; Blackstone EH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 15746747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional and menometric study of side-to-side stapled anastomosis and traditional hand-sewn anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy.
Deng B; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Tan QY; Zhao YP; Zhou JH; Liao XL; Ma Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18848461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection.
Cooke DT; Lin GC; Lau CL; Zhang L; Si MS; Lee J; Chang AC; Pickens A; Orringer MB
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):177-84; discussion 184-5. PubMed ID: 19559221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.
Lam TC; Fok M; Cheng SW; Wong J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Aug; 104(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 1495302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Law S; Fok M; Chu KM; Wong J
Ann Surg; 1997 Aug; 226(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 9296510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis.
Worrell S; Mumtaz S; Tsuboi K; Lee TH; Mittal SK
J Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 161(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19922950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
Takeyoshi I; Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawashima Y; Ohya T; Kawate S; Arai K; Nakasone Y; Morishita Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis with a new stapler in the surgery of esophageal carcinoma.
Chunwei F; Qingzeng N; Jianliang L; Weiji W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Aug; 28(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 15949948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.
Li H; Hu B; You B; Miao JB; Fu YL; Chen QR
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Apr; 125(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 22613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial.
Laterza E; de' Manzoni G; Veraldi GF; Guglielmi A; Tedesco P; Cordiano C
Eur J Surg; 1999 Nov; 165(11):1051-4. PubMed ID: 10595609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients.
Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J
Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses.
Craig SR; Walker WS; Cameron EW; Wightman AJ
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1996 Feb; 41(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 8930036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical factors influence the outcome after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a consecutive series of 240 patients at an experienced center.
Ott K; Bader FG; Lordick F; Feith M; Bartels H; Siewert JR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):1017-25. PubMed ID: 19189186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]