480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18672983)
1. Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage: comparison of two procedures.
Han JS; John V; Blanchard SB; Kowolik MJ; Eckert GJ
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18672983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of the epithelial collar on the subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Byun HY; Oh TJ; Abuhussein HM; Yamashita J; Soehren SE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 80(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 19485822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 21870975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
da Silva RC; Joly JC; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15088880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the effectiveness and predictability of transpositional flap vs connective tissue graft for coverage of Miller's class-I and class-II facial marginal tissue recession lesions: a clinical study.
Baghele ON; Pol DG
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 22945709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Esthetic and dimensional evaluation of free connective tissue grafts in prosthetically treated patients: a 1-year clinical study.
Orsini M; Orsini G; Benlloch D; Aranda JJ; Lázaro P; Sanz M
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):470-7. PubMed ID: 15088886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of gingival recession: comparison of two techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Tözüm TF; Keçeli HG; Güncü GN; Hatipoğlu H; Sengün D
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1842-8. PubMed ID: 16274302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16460241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Root coverage in molar recession: report of 50 consecutive cases treated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):703-8. PubMed ID: 12816304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
Ito K; Oshio K; Shiomi N; Murai S
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Rasperini G; Roccuzzo M; Francetti L; Acunzo R; Consonni D; Silvestri M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Apr; 31(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 21491012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
