These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18673045)

  • 1. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Park P; Foley KT
    Neurosurg Focus; 2008; 25(2):E16. PubMed ID: 18673045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
    Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up.
    Zairi F; Arikat A; Allaoui M; Assaker R
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 May; 74(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 23307308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
    Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spontaneous slip reduction of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis following circumferential release via bilateral minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note and short-term outcome.
    Pan J; Li L; Qian L; Zhou W; Tan J; Zou L; Yang M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 20714277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1780-4. PubMed ID: 20411281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and radiographic outcomes using local bone shavings as autograft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kasliwal MK; Deutsch H
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):185-90. PubMed ID: 22120378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: In Situ Versus Reduction.
    Fan G; Gu G; Zhu Y; Guan X; Hu A; Wu X; Zhang H; He S
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 90():580-587.e1. PubMed ID: 26915276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with or without reduction: A comparative study.
    Fan G; Zhang H; Guan X; Gu G; Wu X; Hu A; Gu X; He S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 33():111-118. PubMed ID: 27443498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
    Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation.
    Jang JS; Lee SH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Sep; 3(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16235705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with posterior fixation versus transsacral cage fusion in situ with posterior fixation in the treatment of Grade 2 adult isthmic spondylolisthesis in the lumbosacral spine.
    Gong K; Wang Z; Luo Z
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 20809736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical study on lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
    Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Ren XJ; Chu TW; Wang WD; Zheng WJ; Pan Y; Huang B
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 49(12):1076-80. PubMed ID: 22333446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction.
    Scheer JK; Auffinger B; Wong RH; Lam SK; Lawton CD; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Smith ZA; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 25753232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.