BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18673352)

  • 1. Errors in patient specimen collection: application of statistical process control.
    Dzik WS; Beckman N; Selleng K; Heddle N; Szczepiorkowski Z; Wendel S; Murphy M
    Transfusion; 2008 Oct; 48(10):2143-51. PubMed ID: 18673352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An international study of the performance of sample collection from patients.
    Dzik WH; Murphy MF; Andreu G; Heddle N; Hogman C; Kekomaki R; Murphy S; Shimizu M; Smit-Sibinga CT;
    Vox Sang; 2003 Jul; 85(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 12823729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strict adherence to a blood bank specimen labeling policy by all clinical laboratories significantly reduces the incidence of "wrong blood in tube".
    O'Neill E; Richardson-Weber L; McCormack G; Uhl L; Haspel RL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Aug; 132(2):164-8; quiz 306. PubMed ID: 19605809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tubes for pretransfusion testing should be collected by blood bank staff and hand labelled until the implementation of new technology for improved sample labelling. Results of a prospective study.
    Gonzalez-Porras JR; Graciani IF; Alvarez M; Pinto J; Conde MP; Nieto MJ; Corral M
    Vox Sang; 2008 Jul; 95(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 18393947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of ABO discrepancies occurring in 35 French hospitals.
    Chiaroni J; Legrand D; Dettori I; Ferrera V
    Transfusion; 2004 Jun; 44(6):860-4. PubMed ID: 15157252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current performance of patient sample collection in the UK.
    Murphy MF; Stearn BE; Dzik WH
    Transfus Med; 2004 Apr; 14(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 15113376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic patient identification for sample labeling reduces wrong blood in tube errors.
    Kaufman RM; Dinh A; Cohn CS; Fung MK; Gorlin J; Melanson S; Murphy MF; Ziman A; Elahie AL; Chasse D; Degree L; Dunbar NM; Dzik WH; Flanagan P; Gabert K; Ipe TS; Jackson B; Lane D; Raspollini E; Ray C; Sharon Y; Ellis M; Selleng K; Staves J; Yu P; Zeller M; Yazer M;
    Transfusion; 2019 Mar; 59(3):972-980. PubMed ID: 30549289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consecutive national surveys of ABO-incompatible blood transfusion in Japan.
    Fujii Y; Shibata Y; Miyata S; Inaba S; Asai T; Hoshi Y; Takamatsu J; Takahashi K; Ohto H; Juji T; Sagawa K
    Vox Sang; 2009 Oct; 97(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 19476605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nearly two decades using the check-type to prevent ABO incompatible transfusions: one institution's experience.
    Figueroa PI; Ziman A; Wheeler C; Gornbein J; Monson M; Calhoun L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Sep; 126(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 16880143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced detection of blood bank sample collection errors with a centralized patient database.
    MacIvor D; Triulzi DJ; Yazer MH
    Transfusion; 2009 Jan; 49(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 18798804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exponential error reduction in pretransfusion testing with automation.
    South SF; Casina TS; Li L
    Transfusion; 2012 Aug; 52(8):81S-87S. PubMed ID: 22882101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenges and opportunities to prevent transfusion errors: a Qualitative Evaluation for Safer Transfusion (QUEST).
    Heddle NM; Fung M; Hervig T; Szczepiorkowski ZM; Torretta L; Arnold E; Lane S; Murphy MF;
    Transfusion; 2012 Aug; 52(8):1687-95. PubMed ID: 22229518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simple method helps to detect transfusion specimen errors.
    Ehrlich A
    Hospitals; 1976 Sep; 50(17):89-90. PubMed ID: 955616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience with the medical event reporting system for transfusion medicine (MERS-TM) at three hospitals.
    Callum JL; Merkley LL; Coovadia AS; Lima AP; Kaplan HS
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2004 Oct; 31(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15501417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wrong blood in tube - potential for serious outcomes: can it be prevented?
    Bolton-Maggs PH; Wood EM; Wiersum-Osselton JC
    Br J Haematol; 2015 Jan; 168(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 25284036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Wrong blood in tube': solutions for a persistent problem.
    Ansari S; Szallasi A
    Vox Sang; 2011 Apr; 100(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 20738838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wrong blood in tube error: first study on donor blood samples.
    Vuk T; Cipek V; Hećimović A; Jukić I
    Transfusion; 2014 Apr; 54(4):1200-2. PubMed ID: 24724790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The immunohematologic and patient safety benefits of a centralized transfusion database.
    Delaney M; Dinwiddie S; Nester TN; Aubuchon JA
    Transfusion; 2013 Apr; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 22803792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using standard desk-top tools to monitor medical error rates.
    Carroll CA; Cox KS; Santos SR; Simon SD
    Semin Nurse Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 12092273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample collection and sample handling errors submitted to the transfusion error surveillance system, 2006 to 2015.
    Strauss R; Downie H; Wilson A; Mounchili A; Berry B; Cserti-Gazdewich C; Callum J
    Transfusion; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1697-1707. PubMed ID: 29664144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.