423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18673353)
1. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer in the United Kingdom.
Whyte S; Cooper KL; Stevenson MD; Madan J; Akehurst R
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):465-74. PubMed ID: 21669371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma receiving curative-intent chemotherapy.
Chan KK; Siu E; Krahn MD; Imrie K; Alibhai SM
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Apr; 30(10):1064-71. PubMed ID: 22393098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is febrile neutropenia prophylaxis with granulocyte-colony stimulating factors economically justified for adjuvant TC chemotherapy in breast cancer?
Skedgel C; Rayson D; Younis T
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jan; 24(1):387-394. PubMed ID: 26081595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Parthan A; Walli-Attaei M; Chandler DB; Lyman GH
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 24657302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of febrile neutropenia prevention with primary versus secondary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review.
Younis T; Rayson D; Jovanovic S; Skedgel C
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Oct; 159(3):425-32. PubMed ID: 27572552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving FEC-D.
Lee EK; Wong WW; Trudeau ME; Chan KK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 150(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 25694355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to primary prophylaxis with antibiotics in small-cell lung cancer.
Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Smit HJ; Biesma B; Wilschut FA; Bootsma GP; de Boo TM; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):2991-7. PubMed ID: 16682725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling the cost effectiveness of secondary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during standard-dose chemotherapy.
Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Termeer E; Severens JL; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 18182670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Primary Prophylaxis of Febrile Neutropenia During Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
Yu JL; Chan K; Kurin M; Pasetka M; Kiss A; Sridhar SS; Warner E
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26387577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
