263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18675497)
1. Compensatory movements of transradial prosthesis users during common tasks.
Carey SL; Jason Highsmith M; Maitland ME; Dubey RV
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1128-35. PubMed ID: 18675497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kinematic comparison of myoelectric and body powered prostheses while performing common activities.
Carey SL; Dubey RV; Bauer GS; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 19367522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Categorization of compensatory motions in transradial myoelectric prosthesis users.
Hussaini A; Zinck A; Kyberd P
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 27473642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living.
Magermans DJ; Chadwick EK; Veeger HE; van der Helm FC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jul; 20(6):591-9. PubMed ID: 15890439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks.
Major MJ; Stine RL; Heckathorne CW; Fatone S; Gard SA
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 11():132. PubMed ID: 25192744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High density electromyography data of normally limbed and transradial amputee subjects for multifunction prosthetic control.
Daley H; Englehart K; Hargrove L; Kuruganti U
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2012 Jun; 22(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 22269773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marker placement to describe the wrist movements during activities of daily living in cyclical tasks.
Murgia A; Kyberd PJ; Chappell PH; Light CM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 15003339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced elbow mobility affects the flexion or extension domain in activities of daily living.
de Groot JH; Angulo SM; Meskers CG; van der Heijden-Maessen HC; Arendzen JH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Aug; 26(7):713-7. PubMed ID: 21444133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible and static wrist units in upper limb prosthesis users: functionality scores, user satisfaction and compensatory movements.
Deijs M; Bongers RM; Ringeling-van Leusen ND; van der Sluis CK
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Mar; 13():26. PubMed ID: 26979272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kinematic comparison of the wrist movements that are possible with a biomechatronics wrist prosthesis and a body-powered prosthesis: a preliminary study.
Abd Razak NA; Abu Osman NA; Wan Abas WA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 May; 8(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 22830946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks.
Bouwsema H; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jul; 25(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 20362374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
Stein RB; Walley M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Compensatory motion in the upper extremity after elbow arthrodesis.
O'Neill OR; Morrey BF; Tanaka S; An KN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Aug; (281):89-96. PubMed ID: 1499233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic analysis of above-knee amputee gait.
Bae TS; Choi K; Hong D; Mun M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jun; 22(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 17321021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of kinematic and parametric information to highlight lack of movement and compensation in the upper extremities during activities of daily living.
Murgia A; Kyberd P; Barnhill T
Gait Posture; 2010 Mar; 31(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 20034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age at first prosthetic fitting and later functional outcome in children and young adults with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency: a cross-sectional study.
Huizing K; Reinders-Messelink H; Maathuis C; Hadders-Algra M; van der Sluis CK
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 20298129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks.
van Andel CJ; Wolterbeek N; Doorenbosch CA; Veeger DH; Harlaar J
Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):120-7. PubMed ID: 17459709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A kinematical analysis of the shoulder after arthroplasty during a hair combing task.
Veeger HE; Magermans DJ; Nagels J; Chadwick EK; van der Helm FC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006; 21 Suppl 1():S39-44. PubMed ID: 16288942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of compensatory movements between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users during activities of daily living.
Engdahl SM; Lee C; Gates DH
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Jul; 97():105713. PubMed ID: 35809535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative Eye Gaze and Movement Differences in Visuomotor Adaptations to Varying Task Demands Among Upper-Extremity Prosthesis Users.
Hebert JS; Boser QA; Valevicius AM; Tanikawa H; Lavoie EB; Vette AH; Pilarski PM; Chapman CS
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911197. PubMed ID: 31517965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
