231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18676900)
21. Comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in a cadaver model with global ligamentous instability at C5-C6.
Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Rubery PT; Wendling A; Aydog T; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 21629162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effects of creep and recovery on the in vitro biomechanical characteristics of human multi-level thoracolumbar spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; van der Veen AJ; Kingma I; Meijer GJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 21251737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Traumatic hyperextension-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine: a technical note on surgical positioning.
Moon AS; Cignetti CA; Isbell JA; Weng C; Rajaram Manoharan SR
Eur Spine J; 2019 May; 28(5):1113-1120. PubMed ID: 30771050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Lumbar intersegmental spacing and angulation in the modified lateral decubitus position versus variants of prone positioning.
Agarwal V; Wildstein M; Tillman JB; Pelkey WL; Alamin TF
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):580-4. PubMed ID: 19482515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spinal instability and the log-rolling maneuver.
McGuire RA; Neville S; Green BA; Watts C
J Trauma; 1987 May; 27(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 3573109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effectiveness of extrication collars tested during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques.
Del Rossi G; Heffernan TP; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 15541692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Effect of Cricoid Pressure on the Unstable Cervical Spine.
Prasarn ML; Horodyski M; Schneider P; Wendling A; Hagberg CA; Rechtine GR
J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 26475486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Horizontal Slide Creates Less Cervical Motion When Centering an Injured Patient on a Spine Board.
DuBose DN; Zdziarski LA; Scott N; Conrad B; Long A; Rechtine GR; Prasarn ML; Horodyski M
J Emerg Med; 2016 May; 50(5):728-33. PubMed ID: 26531709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical testing of anterior and posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation in the cadaveric spine. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004.
Eichholz KM; Hitchon PW; From A; Rubenbauer P; Nakamura S; Lim TH; Torner J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Jul; 1(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 15291031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of the flat torso versus the elevated torso shoulder pad removal techniques in a cadaveric cervical spine instability model.
Horodyski M; DiPaola CP; DiPaola MJ; Conrad BP; Del Rossi G; Rechtine GR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19333100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two column lesions in the thoracolumbar junction: anterior, posterior or combined approach? A comparative biomechanical in vitro investigation.
Bence T; Schreiber U; Grupp T; Steinhauser E; Mittelmeier W
Eur Spine J; 2007 Jun; 16(6):813-20. PubMed ID: 16944226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional mechanical properties of the thoracolumbar junction.
Oxland TR; Lin RM; Panjabi MM
J Orthop Res; 1992 Jul; 10(4):573-80. PubMed ID: 1613631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the Vacuum Mattress versus the Spine Board Alone for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine Injured Patient: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.
Prasarn ML; Hyldmo PK; Zdziarski LA; Loewy E; Dubose D; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1398-E1402. PubMed ID: 28591075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Veen AJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2858-64. PubMed ID: 20010393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The 6-plus-person lift transfer technique compared with other methods of spine boarding.
Del Rossi G; Horodyski MH; Conrad BP; Di Paola CP; Di Paola MJ; Rechtine GR
J Athl Train; 2008; 43(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18335007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device.
Xu HZ; Wang XY; Chi YL; Zhu QA; Lin Y; Huang QS; Dai LY
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 16434133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
