These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18678262)

  • 1. Look who's talking: the deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions.
    Senkowski D; Saint-Amour D; Gruber T; Foxe JJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):379-87. PubMed ID: 18678262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capture of visual attention interferes with multisensory speech processing.
    Krause H; Schneider TR; Engel AK; Senkowski D
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2012; 6():67. PubMed ID: 22973204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a cocktail party.
    Har-Shai Yahav P; Zion Golumbic E
    Elife; 2021 May; 10():. PubMed ID: 33942722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao S; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1575-1591. PubMed ID: 28258437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Look at me when I'm talking to you: Selective attention at a multisensory cocktail party can be decoded using stimulus reconstruction and alpha power modulations.
    O'Sullivan AE; Lim CY; Lalor EC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 50(8):3282-3295. PubMed ID: 31013361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between audio-visual enhancement of speech in different noise environments and SNR: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Liu B; Lin Y; Gao X; Dang J
    Neuroscience; 2013 Sep; 247():145-51. PubMed ID: 23673276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical processing of distracting speech in noisy auditory scenes depends on perceptual demand.
    Hausfeld L; Shiell M; Formisano E; Riecke L
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117670. PubMed ID: 33359352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.
    Fu Z; Wu X; Chen J
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Nov; 16(6):066033. PubMed ID: 31505476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic Estimation of the Auditory Temporal Response Function From MEG in Competing-Speaker Environments.
    Akram S; Simon JZ; Babadi B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Aug; 64(8):1896-1905. PubMed ID: 28113290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological Correlates of Speaker Segregation and Foreground-Background Selection in Ambiguous Listening Situations.
    Gandras K; Grimm S; Bendixen A
    Neuroscience; 2018 Oct; 389():19-29. PubMed ID: 28735101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring steady-state visual evoked potentials as an index for intermodal and crossmodal spatial attention.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao X; Gao S; Röder B
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):665-75. PubMed ID: 20874752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication.
    Kelly SP; Lalor EC; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Jun; 13(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16003896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain correlates of the orientation of auditory spatial attention onto speaker location in a "cocktail-party" situation.
    Lewald J; Hanenberg C; Getzmann S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1484-95. PubMed ID: 27333881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional modulation of neural responses to illusory shapes: Evidence from steady-state and evoked visual potentials.
    Wittenhagen L; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Mar; 125():70-80. PubMed ID: 30711611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-down attention regulates the neural expression of audiovisual integration.
    Morís Fernández L; Visser M; Ventura-Campos N; Ávila C; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():272-85. PubMed ID: 26119022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range.
    Müller MM; Picton TW; Valdes-Sosa P; Riera J; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Apr; 6(4):249-61. PubMed ID: 9593922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual abilities are important for auditory-only speech recognition: evidence from autism spectrum disorder.
    Schelinski S; Riedel P; von Kriegstein K
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():1-11. PubMed ID: 25283605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG-based auditory attention detection: boundary conditions for background noise and speaker positions.
    Das N; Bertrand A; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Dec; 15(6):066017. PubMed ID: 30207293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Different Acoustic Components on EEG-Based Auditory Attention Decoding in Noisy and Reverberant Conditions.
    Aroudi A; Mirkovic B; De Vos M; Doclo S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Apr; 27(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 30843845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Look who's talking!" Gaze Patterns for Implicit and Explicit Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Detection in Children With High-Functioning Autism.
    Grossman RB; Steinhart E; Mitchell T; McIlvane W
    Autism Res; 2015 Jun; 8(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 25620208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.