These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18678386)

  • 1. Characterising humic acid fouling of nanofiltration membranes using bisphenol A as a molecular indicator.
    Nghiem LD; Vogel D; Khan S
    Water Res; 2008 Sep; 42(15):4049-58. PubMed ID: 18678386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production.
    Jermann D; Pronk W; Meylan S; Boller M
    Water Res; 2007 Apr; 41(8):1713-22. PubMed ID: 17346766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
    Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying the rejection mechanism for nanofiltration membranes fouled by humic acid and calcium ions exemplified by acetaminophen, sulfamethoxazole, and triclosan.
    Chang EE; Chang YC; Liang CH; Huang CP; Chiang PC
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Jun; 221-222():19-27. PubMed ID: 22554383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of organic and colloidal fouling on the removal of sulphamethoxazole by nanofiltration membranes.
    Nghiem LD; Espendiller C; Braun G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 18653950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nanofiltration membrane fouling by oppositely charged macromolecules: investigation on flux behavior, foulant mass deposition, and solute rejection.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):8941-7. PubMed ID: 21928796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Shao J; Hou J; Song H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane fouling by natural organic matter: Mechanisms and mitigation by pre-ozonation and pH.
    Yu W; Liu T; Crawshaw J; Liu T; Graham N
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():353-362. PubMed ID: 29665507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of interactions between NOM and particles on UF fouling mechanisms.
    Jermann D; Pronk W; Kägi R; Halbeisen M; Boller M
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3870-8. PubMed ID: 18715606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transition in fouling mechanism in microfiltration of a surface water.
    Yamamura H; Chae S; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3812-22. PubMed ID: 17631376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrafiltration membrane fouling by extracellular organic matters (EOM) of Microcystis aeruginosa in stationary phase: influences of interfacial characteristics of foulants and fouling mechanisms.
    Qu F; Liang H; Wang Z; Wang H; Yu H; Li G
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(5):1490-500. PubMed ID: 22178303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of pesticide Endosulfan by nanofiltration: influence of organic matter-pesticide complexation and solute-membrane interactions.
    De Munari A; Semiao AJ; Antizar-Ladislao B
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3484-96. PubMed ID: 23615337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling.
    Her N; Amy G; Park HR; Song M
    Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(6):1427-38. PubMed ID: 15016519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Natural organic matter fouling behaviors on superwetting nanofiltration membranes.
    Shan L; Fan H; Guo H; Ji S; Zhang G
    Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():121-132. PubMed ID: 26900973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enzymatic treatment for controlling irreversible membrane fouling in cross-flow humic acid-fed ultrafiltration.
    Yu CH; Fang LC; Lateef SK; Wu CH; Lin CF
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 May; 177(1-3):1153-8. PubMed ID: 20116922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of soluble organic matters on membrane fouling index.
    Chuang SH; Chang WC; Chang MC; Sung MA
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Mar; 100(5):1875-7. PubMed ID: 19006662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes.
    Yangali-Quintanilla V; Sadmani A; McConville M; Kennedy M; Amy G
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2349-62. PubMed ID: 19303127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.