258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18679780)
1. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of an abbreviated version of the structured interview of reported symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Dole T; Pivovarova E; Zapf PA
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17558482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Study of the SIRS with severely traumatized patients.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Correa AA; Gillard ND; Ross CA
J Pers Assess; 2009 Sep; 91(5):429-38. PubMed ID: 19672749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The utility of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Weiss RA; Rosenfeld B; Farkas MR
Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 21561992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the clinical utility of the SIRS cognitive items: preliminary reliability, validity, and normative data in pretrial and clinical samples.
Wynkoop TF; Frederick RI; Hoy M
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 21(7):651-6. PubMed ID: 16982172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.
Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Damages and rewards: assessment of malingered disorders in compensation cases.
Rogers R; Payne JW
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(5):645-58. PubMed ID: 17016811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: findings from simulation and known group samples.
Wygant DB; Ben-Porath YS; Arbisi PA; Berry DT; Freeman DB; Heilbronner RL
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 24(7):671-80. PubMed ID: 19797242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison.
Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J; Munizza J
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17058121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compensation and malingering in traumatic brain injury: a dose-response relationship?
Bianchini KJ; Curtis KL; Greve KW
Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Dec; 20(4):831-47. PubMed ID: 16980265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions.
Vitacco MJ; Jackson RL; Rogers R; Neumann CS; Miller HA; Gabel J
Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 18258736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of genuine and simulated dissociative identity disorder on the structured interview of reported symptoms.
Brand BL; McNary SW; Loewenstein RJ; Kolos AC; Barr SR
J Trauma Dissociation; 2006; 7(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 16618696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Spanish SIRS with monolingual Hispanic outpatients.
Correa AA; Rogers R; Hoersting R
J Pers Assess; 2010 Sep; 92(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 20706932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample.
McDermott BE; Sokolov G
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):753-65. PubMed ID: 19743514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment.
Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B
Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and Admissibility in Forensic Mental Health Assessment.
Wygant DB; Tylicki JL; Disney LF; Connelly AI
J Pers Assess; 2022; 104(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 34871131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting.
Alwes YR; Clark JA; Berry DT; Granacher RP
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18938665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteria.
Tylicki JL; Wygant DB; Tarescavage AM; Frederick RI; Tyner EA; Granacher RP; Sellbom M
Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1144-1159. PubMed ID: 29389175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B
Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
