These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18679780)

  • 1. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
    Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of an abbreviated version of the structured interview of reported symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings.
    Green D; Rosenfeld B; Dole T; Pivovarova E; Zapf PA
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17558482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Study of the SIRS with severely traumatized patients.
    Rogers R; Payne JW; Correa AA; Gillard ND; Ross CA
    J Pers Assess; 2009 Sep; 91(5):429-38. PubMed ID: 19672749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The utility of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
    Weiss RA; Rosenfeld B; Farkas MR
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 21561992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the clinical utility of the SIRS cognitive items: preliminary reliability, validity, and normative data in pretrial and clinical samples.
    Wynkoop TF; Frederick RI; Hoy M
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 21(7):651-6. PubMed ID: 16982172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.
    Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Damages and rewards: assessment of malingered disorders in compensation cases.
    Rogers R; Payne JW
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(5):645-58. PubMed ID: 17016811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: findings from simulation and known group samples.
    Wygant DB; Ben-Porath YS; Arbisi PA; Berry DT; Freeman DB; Heilbronner RL
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 24(7):671-80. PubMed ID: 19797242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison.
    Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J; Munizza J
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17058121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compensation and malingering in traumatic brain injury: a dose-response relationship?
    Bianchini KJ; Curtis KL; Greve KW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Dec; 20(4):831-47. PubMed ID: 16980265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions.
    Vitacco MJ; Jackson RL; Rogers R; Neumann CS; Miller HA; Gabel J
    Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 18258736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of genuine and simulated dissociative identity disorder on the structured interview of reported symptoms.
    Brand BL; McNary SW; Loewenstein RJ; Kolos AC; Barr SR
    J Trauma Dissociation; 2006; 7(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 16618696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Spanish SIRS with monolingual Hispanic outpatients.
    Correa AA; Rogers R; Hoersting R
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Sep; 92(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 20706932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample.
    McDermott BE; Sokolov G
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):753-65. PubMed ID: 19743514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment.
    Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B
    Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
    Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and Admissibility in Forensic Mental Health Assessment.
    Wygant DB; Tylicki JL; Disney LF; Connelly AI
    J Pers Assess; 2022; 104(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 34871131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting.
    Alwes YR; Clark JA; Berry DT; Granacher RP
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18938665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparability of Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-Second Edition (SIRS-2) classifications with external response bias criteria.
    Tylicki JL; Wygant DB; Tarescavage AM; Frederick RI; Tyner EA; Granacher RP; Sellbom M
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1144-1159. PubMed ID: 29389175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.
    Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B
    Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.