These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effects of auditory recognition learning on the perception of vocal features in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Meliza CD J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3115-23. PubMed ID: 22087940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual classification based on the component structure of song in European starlings. Gentner TQ; Hulse SH J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3369-81. PubMed ID: 10875382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural systems for individual song recognition in adult birds. Gentner TQ Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1016():282-302. PubMed ID: 15313781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Song recognition learning and stimulus-specific weakening of neural responses in the avian auditory forebrain. Thompson JV; Gentner TQ J Neurophysiol; 2010 Apr; 103(4):1785-97. PubMed ID: 20107117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional differences in forebrain auditory regions during learned vocal recognition in songbirds. Gentner TQ; Hulse SH; Ball GF J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Dec; 190(12):1001-10. PubMed ID: 15449092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory temporal pattern learning by songbirds using maximal stimulus diversity and minimal repetition. Comins JA; Gentner TQ Anim Cogn; 2014 Sep; 17(5):1023-30. PubMed ID: 24526277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Hulse SH; MacDougall-Shackleton SA; Wisniewski AB J Comp Psychol; 1997 Mar; 111(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 9090135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual vocal recognition and the effect of partial lesions to HVc on discrimination, learning, and categorization of conspecific song in adult songbirds. Gentner TQ; Hulse SH; Bentley GE; Ball GF J Neurobiol; 2000 Jan; 42(1):117-33. PubMed ID: 10623906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Representations of conspecific song by starling secondary forebrain auditory neurons: toward a hierarchical framework. Meliza CD; Chi Z; Margoliash D J Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 103(3):1195-208. PubMed ID: 20032245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Familiar But Unexpected: Effects of Sound Context Statistics on Auditory Responses in the Songbird Forebrain. Lu K; Vicario DS J Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 37(49):12006-12017. PubMed ID: 29118103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory Selectivity for Spectral Contrast in Cortical Neurons and Behavior. So NLT; Edwards JA; Woolley SMN J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1015-1027. PubMed ID: 31826944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working memory for patterned sequences of auditory objects in a songbird. Comins JA; Gentner TQ Cognition; 2010 Oct; 117(1):38-53. PubMed ID: 20638052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiple levels of representation of song by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): open-ended categorization of starling song types and differential forgetting of song categories and exemplars. Braaten RF J Comp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 114(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 10739312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Songbirds use spectral shape, not pitch, for sound pattern recognition. Bregman MR; Patel AD; Gentner TQ Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Feb; 113(6):1666-71. PubMed ID: 26811447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]