These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18681914)

  • 1. Genetic independence of female signal form and male receiver design in the almond moth, Cadra cautella.
    Allison JD; Roff DA; Cardé RT
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1666-72. PubMed ID: 18681914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Pheromone Blend Components, Sex Ratio, and Population Size on the Mating of Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).
    Sammani AMP; Dissanayaka DMSK; Wijayaratne LKW; Morrison WR
    J Insect Sci; 2020 Nov; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 33253387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of receptors of main sex-pheromone components of three Lepidopteran species.
    Mitsuno H; Sakurai T; Murai M; Yasuda T; Kugimiya S; Ozawa R; Toyohara H; Takabayashi J; Miyoshi H; Nishioka T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(5):893-902. PubMed ID: 18691330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference.
    Iyengar VK; Reeve HK; Eisner T
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):830-2. PubMed ID: 12397356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heritable variation in the sex pheromone of the almond moth, Cadra cautella.
    Allison JD; Cardé RT
    J Chem Ecol; 2006 Mar; 32(3):621-41. PubMed ID: 16586041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic architecture of sexual selection: QTL mapping of male song and female receiver traits in an acoustic moth.
    Limousin D; Streiff R; Courtois B; Dupuy V; Alem S; Greenfield MD
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44554. PubMed ID: 22957082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. bric à brac controls sex pheromone choice by male European corn borer moths.
    Unbehend M; Kozak GM; Koutroumpa F; Coates BS; Dekker T; Groot AT; Heckel DG; Dopman EB
    Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):2818. PubMed ID: 33990556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduction in an almond moth Ephestia cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) population by means of mating disruption.
    Ryne C; Ekeberg M; Jonzén N; Oehlschlager C; Löfstedt C; Anderbrant O
    Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Oct; 62(10):912-8. PubMed ID: 16835881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.
    Fuller RC; Houle D; Travis J
    Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 16224700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pest management programmes in vineyards using male mating disruption.
    Harari AR; Zahavi T; Gordon D; Anshelevich L; Harel M; Ovadia S; Dunkelblum E
    Pest Manag Sci; 2007 Aug; 63(8):769-75. PubMed ID: 17523143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Z linkage of female promiscuity genes in the moth Utetheisa ornatrix: support for the sexy-sperm hypothesis?
    Iyengar VK; Reeve HK
    Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1267-72. PubMed ID: 20002164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proximity of signallers can maintain sexual signal variation under stabilizing selection.
    van Wijk M; Heath J; Lievers R; Schal C; Groot AT
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):18101. PubMed ID: 29273813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of chemical communication in mate choice.
    Johansson BG; Jones TM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):265-89. PubMed ID: 17437561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild.
    Qvarnström A; Brommer JE; Gustafsson L
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):84-6. PubMed ID: 16672970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic basis of sex pheromone blend difference between Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
    Wang HL; Ming QL; Zhao CH; Wang CZ
    J Insect Physiol; 2008 May; 54(5):813-7. PubMed ID: 18405915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allochronic separation versus mate choice: nonrandom patterns of mating between fall armyworm host strains.
    Schöfl G; Dill A; Heckel DG; Groot AT
    Am Nat; 2011 Apr; 177(4):470-85. PubMed ID: 21460569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geographic and temporal variation in moth chemical communication.
    Groot AT; Inglis O; Bowdridge S; Santangelo RG; Blanco C; López JD; Vargas AT; Gould F; Schal C
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 19473383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of moth sex pheromone desaturases.
    Rooney AP
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1170():506-10. PubMed ID: 19686186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the cabbage looper moth response to sex pheromone.
    Hemmann DJ; Allison JD; Haynes KF
    J Chem Ecol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1476-86. PubMed ID: 18818970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis and manipulation of the structure of odor plumes from a piezo-electric release system and measurements of upwind flight of male almond moths, Cadra cautella, to pheromone plumes.
    Girling RD; Cardé RT
    J Chem Ecol; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1927-45. PubMed ID: 17828430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.