137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18681914)
1. Genetic independence of female signal form and male receiver design in the almond moth, Cadra cautella.
Allison JD; Roff DA; Cardé RT
J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1666-72. PubMed ID: 18681914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Pheromone Blend Components, Sex Ratio, and Population Size on the Mating of Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).
Sammani AMP; Dissanayaka DMSK; Wijayaratne LKW; Morrison WR
J Insect Sci; 2020 Nov; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 33253387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of receptors of main sex-pheromone components of three Lepidopteran species.
Mitsuno H; Sakurai T; Murai M; Yasuda T; Kugimiya S; Ozawa R; Toyohara H; Takabayashi J; Miyoshi H; Nishioka T
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(5):893-902. PubMed ID: 18691330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference.
Iyengar VK; Reeve HK; Eisner T
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):830-2. PubMed ID: 12397356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Heritable variation in the sex pheromone of the almond moth, Cadra cautella.
Allison JD; Cardé RT
J Chem Ecol; 2006 Mar; 32(3):621-41. PubMed ID: 16586041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic architecture of sexual selection: QTL mapping of male song and female receiver traits in an acoustic moth.
Limousin D; Streiff R; Courtois B; Dupuy V; Alem S; Greenfield MD
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44554. PubMed ID: 22957082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. bric à brac controls sex pheromone choice by male European corn borer moths.
Unbehend M; Kozak GM; Koutroumpa F; Coates BS; Dekker T; Groot AT; Heckel DG; Dopman EB
Nat Commun; 2021 May; 12(1):2818. PubMed ID: 33990556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction in an almond moth Ephestia cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) population by means of mating disruption.
Ryne C; Ekeberg M; Jonzén N; Oehlschlager C; Löfstedt C; Anderbrant O
Pest Manag Sci; 2006 Oct; 62(10):912-8. PubMed ID: 16835881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.
Fuller RC; Houle D; Travis J
Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 16224700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pest management programmes in vineyards using male mating disruption.
Harari AR; Zahavi T; Gordon D; Anshelevich L; Harel M; Ovadia S; Dunkelblum E
Pest Manag Sci; 2007 Aug; 63(8):769-75. PubMed ID: 17523143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Z linkage of female promiscuity genes in the moth Utetheisa ornatrix: support for the sexy-sperm hypothesis?
Iyengar VK; Reeve HK
Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1267-72. PubMed ID: 20002164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proximity of signallers can maintain sexual signal variation under stabilizing selection.
van Wijk M; Heath J; Lievers R; Schal C; Groot AT
Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):18101. PubMed ID: 29273813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of chemical communication in mate choice.
Johansson BG; Jones TM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):265-89. PubMed ID: 17437561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild.
Qvarnström A; Brommer JE; Gustafsson L
Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):84-6. PubMed ID: 16672970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic basis of sex pheromone blend difference between Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
Wang HL; Ming QL; Zhao CH; Wang CZ
J Insect Physiol; 2008 May; 54(5):813-7. PubMed ID: 18405915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allochronic separation versus mate choice: nonrandom patterns of mating between fall armyworm host strains.
Schöfl G; Dill A; Heckel DG; Groot AT
Am Nat; 2011 Apr; 177(4):470-85. PubMed ID: 21460569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Geographic and temporal variation in moth chemical communication.
Groot AT; Inglis O; Bowdridge S; Santangelo RG; Blanco C; López JD; Vargas AT; Gould F; Schal C
Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 19473383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution of moth sex pheromone desaturases.
Rooney AP
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1170():506-10. PubMed ID: 19686186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trade-off between sensitivity and specificity in the cabbage looper moth response to sex pheromone.
Hemmann DJ; Allison JD; Haynes KF
J Chem Ecol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1476-86. PubMed ID: 18818970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis and manipulation of the structure of odor plumes from a piezo-electric release system and measurements of upwind flight of male almond moths, Cadra cautella, to pheromone plumes.
Girling RD; Cardé RT
J Chem Ecol; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1927-45. PubMed ID: 17828430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
