These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18682260)

  • 41. Pushing the limits of transparent-motion detection with binocular disparity.
    Greenwood JA; Edwards M
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2615-24. PubMed ID: 16530242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency.
    Peterzell DH; Serrano-Pedraza I; Widdall M; Read JCA
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of depth, eccentricity and size of additional static stimulus on visually induced self-motion perception.
    Nakamura S
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2344-53. PubMed ID: 16516260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A new method for assessing motion-in-depth perception in strabismic patients.
    Watanabe Y; Kezuka T; Harasawa K; Usui M; Yaguchi H; Shioiri S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17596334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Illusory depth induced by binocular torsional misalignment.
    Mitsudo H
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1303-14. PubMed ID: 17412388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the typical development of stereopsis: fine and coarse processing.
    Giaschi D; Narasimhan S; Solski A; Harrison E; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 89():65-71. PubMed ID: 23891704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Processing vertical size disparities in distinct depth planes.
    Duke PA; Howard IP
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):10. PubMed ID: 22904355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dissociations between slant-contrast and reversed slant-contrast.
    Poom L; Olsson H; Börjesson E
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 17300825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. What is the depth of a sinusoidal grating?
    McKee SP; Verghese P; Farell B
    J Vis; 2004 Jun; 4(7):524-38. PubMed ID: 15330699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: masking and facilitation.
    Summers RJ; Meese TS
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1894-900. PubMed ID: 19426749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Isolation and interaction of ON and OFF pathways in human vision: pattern--polarity effects on contrast discrimination.
    Bowen RW
    Vision Res; 1995 Sep; 35(17):2479-90. PubMed ID: 8594815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Latent stereopsis for motion in depth in strabismic amblyopia.
    Hess RF; Mansouri B; Thompson B; Gheorghiu E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 50(10):5006-16. PubMed ID: 19458340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Stereo dynamics are not scale-dependent.
    Hess RF; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1911-23. PubMed ID: 16469355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation.
    Baker DH; Meese TS; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2008 Jul; 48(15):1625-40. PubMed ID: 18547600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Importance of phase alignment for interocular suppression.
    Maehara G; Huang PC; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1838-47. PubMed ID: 19401207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Shading Beats Binocular Disparity in Depth from Luminance Gradients: Evidence against a Maximum Likelihood Principle for Cue Combination.
    Chen CC; Tyler CW
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0132658. PubMed ID: 26258494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. 'Coarse-to-fine' cyclopean processing.
    Popple AV; Findlay JM
    Perception; 1999; 28(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 10615457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Spatio-temporal requirements for binocular correlation in stereopsis.
    Lankheet MJ; Lennie P
    Vision Res; 1996 Feb; 36(4):527-38. PubMed ID: 8854998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The role of binocular stereopsis in monoptic depth perception.
    Wilcox LM; Harris JM; McKee SP
    Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2367-77. PubMed ID: 17651780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
    Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.