These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1868299)

  • 1. Ventouse or forceps?
    Johanson RB
    Br J Hosp Med; 1991 Jul; 46(1):13. PubMed ID: 1868299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The vacuum extraction to forceps in posterior presentation comparison.
    Escamilla JO; Escamilla GH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1398-9. PubMed ID: 9215210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forceps and vacuum extraction.
    Chamberlain G
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Dec; 7(3):511-27. PubMed ID: 7011647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the use of the silastic obstetric vacuum extractor to Kielland's forceps.
    Hastie SJ; MacLean AB
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 12(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3718343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vacuum extraction.
    Epperly TD; Breitinger ER
    Am Fam Physician; 1988 Sep; 38(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 3414471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Forceps verses vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1208. PubMed ID: 17127090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ventouse - an evaluation.
    Gnanapragasam JB
    Ceylon Med J; 1975 Jun; 20(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 1157194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Is rotation in vacuum extraction possible?].
    Krmpotić F; Matejcić N
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Jan; 49(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 2917710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obstetric vacuum extraction.
    Thiery M
    Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1985; 14():73-111. PubMed ID: 3885100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative vacuum supplies for ventouse deliveries.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Jun; 96(6):751-2. PubMed ID: 2804003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity in midforceps delivery and midpelvis vacuum extraction.
    Baerthlein WC; Moodley S; Stinson SK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):594-7. PubMed ID: 3960431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice of instrument for vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 9(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9425578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.
    Senanayake H
    BJOG; 2006 Aug; 113(8):978; author reply 978 -9. PubMed ID: 16907949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.