These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1868299)

  • 21. [USE OF VAGINAL OBSTETRICAL OPERATIONS IN CEPHALIC PRESENTATION (FORCEPS, VACUUM EXTRACTION, SPECULUM DELIVERY, SCALP FORCEPS)].
    STECH D
    Med Klin; 1963 Nov; 58():1785-94. PubMed ID: 14097656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Schaal JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 17208497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Maillet R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):81. PubMed ID: 17208499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device.
    Vacca A
    BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):492; author reply 494-5. PubMed ID: 16553663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparative study of delivery by vacuum extraction or forceps].
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1987 Sep; 22(5):267-8, 310. PubMed ID: 3443017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Experience with Shute's parallel forceps].
    Stranz G; Krzyzanowski A
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1980 Apr; 74(8):360-3. PubMed ID: 7415308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section.
    Bhide A; Guven M; Prefumo F; Vankalayapati P; Thilaganathan B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jul; 20(7):541-5. PubMed ID: 17674268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Chan et all retrospective study of vacuum versus forceps is really a study of difference of practice and not a study of different instruments.
    Rae PB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Nov; 40(4):479. PubMed ID: 11194449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Methods of delivery in patients with previous cesarean section at the Obstetrical and Gynecological Clinic of Perugia in the 5-year period 1972--1976].
    Gerli M; Gilardi G; Giannone E; Ballerani M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1978 Nov; 30(11):989-92. PubMed ID: 733112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Vacuum extraction of the fetus in combination with a pneumatic bandage in different obstetrical pathological states].
    Molzhaninov IeV; Ishchenko IM; Kykhtynova RA; Hryshchenko MIe
    Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1980; (2):43-5. PubMed ID: 7383728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of the soft, silicone obstetric vacuum cup for delivery of the fetal head at cesarean section.
    Pelosi MA; Apuzzio J
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Apr; 29(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 6716375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY IN NEWBORN INFANTS AFTER NORMAL DELIVERY AND AFTER FORCEPS AND VACUUM EXTRACTION].
    CACAVA KV
    Cesk Gynekol; 1964 Dec; 43():725-30. PubMed ID: 14250686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
    Broekhuizen FF; Washington JM; Johnson F; Hamilton PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial.
    Johanson R; Pusey J; Livera N; Jones P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 May; 96(5):537-44. PubMed ID: 2667628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of instrumental vaginal delivery in low resource settings.
    Ameh CA; Weeks AD
    BJOG; 2009 Oct; 116 Suppl 1():22-5. PubMed ID: 19740166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ABC of labour care: operative delivery.
    Chamberlain G; Steer P
    BMJ; 1999 May; 318(7193):1260-4. PubMed ID: 10231260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Worldwide survey of assisted vaginal delivery.
    Hillier CE; Johanson RB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1994 Nov; 47(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 7843478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.