These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18683192)

  • 41. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique.
    Curtis AR; Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 18656254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. ESEM-EDS: In vivo characterization of the Ni hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens.
    Mattarozzi M; Visioli G; Sanangelantoni AM; Careri M
    Micron; 2015 Aug; 75():18-26. PubMed ID: 25984895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of SEM vacuum on bone micromechanics using in situ AFM.
    Jimenez-Palomar I; Shipov A; Shahar R; Barber AH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 22100089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The mechanical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Smith AE; Zhang Z; Thomas CR; Moxham KE; Middelberg AP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2000 Aug; 97(18):9871-4. PubMed ID: 10963659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of the mechanical damage on wheat starch granules by SEM, ESEM, AFM and texture image analysis.
    Barrera GN; Calderón-Domínguez G; Chanona-Pérez J; Gutiérrez-López GF; León AE; Ribotta PD
    Carbohydr Polym; 2013 Nov; 98(2):1449-57. PubMed ID: 24053826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Changes in particle area measurements due to SEM accelerating voltage and magnification.
    Yañez MJ; Barbosa SE
    Microsc Res Tech; 2003 Aug; 61(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 12845573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The case for low voltage high resolution scanning electron microscopy of biological samples.
    Pawley JB; Erlandsen SL
    Scanning Microsc Suppl; 1989; 3():163-78. PubMed ID: 2694267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An electrostatic glass actuator for ultrahigh vacuum: A rotating light trap for continuous beams of laser-cooled atoms.
    Füzesi F; Jornod A; Thomann P; Plimmer MD; Dudle G; Moser R; Sache L; Bleuler H
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Oct; 78(10):103109. PubMed ID: 17979408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of four different processing techniques on the microstructure of potatoes: comparison with fresh samples in the ESEM.
    Uwins PJ; Murray M; Gould RJ
    Microsc Res Tech; 1993 Aug; 25(5-6):412-8. PubMed ID: 8400433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Direct observation of unstained biological specimens in water by the frequency transmission electric-field method using SEM.
    Ogura T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92780. PubMed ID: 24651483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Microfluidic device for a rapid immobilization of zebrafish larvae in environmental scanning electron microscopy.
    Akagi J; Zhu F; Skommer J; Hall CJ; Crosier PS; Cialkowski M; Wlodkowic D
    Cytometry A; 2015 Mar; 87(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 25483307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The use of environmental scanning electron microscopy for imaging wet and insulating materials.
    Donald AM
    Nat Mater; 2003 Aug; 2(8):511-6. PubMed ID: 12894259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A novel method for "Wet" SEM.
    Barshack I; Kopolovic J; Chowers Y; Gileadi O; Vainshtein A; Zik O; Behar V
    Ultrastruct Pathol; 2004; 28(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 14967596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Probing liquid surfaces under vacuum using SEM and ToF-SIMS.
    Yang L; Yu XY; Zhu Z; Iedema MJ; Cowin JP
    Lab Chip; 2011 Aug; 11(15):2481-4. PubMed ID: 21670825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Observations of the intestinal mucosa using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM); comparison with conventional scanning electron microscopy (CSEM).
    Habold C; Dunel-Erb S; Chevalier C; Laurent P; Le Maho Y; Lignot JH
    Micron; 2003; 34(8):373-9. PubMed ID: 14680923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Scanning electron microscopy: preparation and imaging for SEM.
    Jones CG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 915():1-20. PubMed ID: 22907399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Morphology, mechanical properties and viability of encapsulated cells.
    Svaldo-Lanero T; Krol S; Magrassi R; Diaspro A; Rolandi R; Gliozzi A; Cavalleri O
    Ultramicroscopy; 2007 Oct; 107(10-11):913-21. PubMed ID: 17555876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) as a quantitative method to analyse the attachment of Giardia duodenalis to epithelial cells.
    Maia-Brigagão C; de Souza W
    Micron; 2012 Feb; 43(2-3):494-6. PubMed ID: 21908196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Analysis of high quality monatomic chromium films used in biological high resolution scanning electron microscopy.
    Apkarian RP
    Scanning Microsc; 1994; 8(2):289-99; discussion 299-301. PubMed ID: 7701300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Specialized scanning ion-conductance microscope for imaging of living cells.
    Korchev YE; Milovanovic M; Bashford CL; Bennett DC; Sviderskaya EV; Vodyanoy I; Lab MJ
    J Microsc; 1997 Oct; 188(Pt 1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9369018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.