122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18683202)
1. Introduction to this issue: studies of co-occurring disorders in the criminal justice system.
Sacks S; Melnick G; Grella CE
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 18683202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Synthesis of studies of co-occurring disorder(s) in criminal justice and a research agenda.
Sacks S; Melnick G; Grella CE
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(4):475-86. PubMed ID: 18683198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent developments in mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice systems.
Bailey S; Doreleijers T; Tarbuck P
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2006 Apr; 15(2):391-406, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 16527662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introduction to this issue: diversion from the criminal justice system.
Petrila J
Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 15818602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening young people in the juvenile justice system for behavioral & substance abuse disorders.
Thomas J; Gourley GK; Mele N
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2004 Apr; 42(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 15132245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New models of collaboration between criminal justice and mental health systems.
Morrissey JP; Fagan JA; Cocozza JJ
Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1211-4. PubMed ID: 19884234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Trends in discussion on the medical care observation law between the Japanese Society of Psychiatry and the Committee for the Legal Matters].
Nakajuma T
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2006; 108(10):1051-5. PubMed ID: 17240854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for psychiatric disorders in patients with skin diseases.
Folks DG
J Psychosom Res; 2004 Sep; 57(3):225-6. PubMed ID: 15507246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Girls detained under civil and criminal law in juvenile detention centres; psychiatric disorders, trauma and psychosocial problems].
Hamerlynck SM; Doreleijers TA; Vermeiren RR; Cohen-Kettenis PT
Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2009; 51(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 19194850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Canadian law and the legal process.
Walter B
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):135-6; author reply 136. PubMed ID: 15809259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Introduction to this issue: impulsivity and the law.
Stanford MS; Felthous AR
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):671-3. PubMed ID: 19039795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Competency in the criminal context: an analysis of Robert Schopp's views.
Slobogin C
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 16883613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mental illness and intellectual disability in Magistrates Courts in New South Wales, Australia.
Vanny KA; Levy MH; Greenberg DM; Hayes SC
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Mar; 53(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 19250389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Without thinking: impulsive aggression and criminal responsibility.
Shuman DW; Gold LH
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):723-34. PubMed ID: 19039791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Not yet Uhuru.
Adetunji T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(3):458-9. PubMed ID: 12380437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Intervention by NGO of drug addicts who are in the criminal justice system in Japan].
Oda M
Masui; 2011 Nov; 60 Suppl():S16-24. PubMed ID: 22458019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Canada's new mental disorder disposition provisions: a case study of the British Columbia Criminal Code Review Board.
Grant I
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1997; 20(4):419-43. PubMed ID: 9436053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic screening for metabolic syndrome in consumers with severe mental illness.
Brunero S; Lamont S
Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 19290978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
Covey RD
Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
