These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18683622)
1. The dual implication of dual affordance: stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation. Meiran N Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 18683622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of bivalent and univalent responses during task switching. Mueller SC; Swainson R; Jackson GM Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1157():56-65. PubMed ID: 17544384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A brain-potential study of preparation for and execution of a task-switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task. Elchlepp H; Lavric A; Mizon GA; Monsell S Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 May; 33(5):1137-54. PubMed ID: 21630376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age? Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The bivalency effect in task switching: general and enduring. Meier B; Woodward TS; Rey-Mermet A; Graf P Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 19739903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study. Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs. Strobach T; Liepelt R; Schubert T; Kiesel A Psychol Res; 2012 Jan; 76(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 21360303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Limitations in advance task preparation: switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons. Meiran N; Marciano H Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):540-50. PubMed ID: 12184555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cost of a voluntary task switch. Arrington CM; Logan GD Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):610-5. PubMed ID: 15327632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection. Lawo V; Fels J; Oberem J; Koch I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2010-24. PubMed ID: 25248101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]