These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18683622)

  • 1. The dual implication of dual affordance: stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation.
    Meiran N
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 18683622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of bivalent and univalent responses during task switching.
    Mueller SC; Swainson R; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1157():56-65. PubMed ID: 17544384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.
    Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A brain-potential study of preparation for and execution of a task-switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task.
    Elchlepp H; Lavric A; Mizon GA; Monsell S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 May; 33(5):1137-54. PubMed ID: 21630376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task conflict effect in task switching.
    Braverman A; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 20309709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bivalency effect in task switching: general and enduring.
    Meier B; Woodward TS; Rey-Mermet A; Graf P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 19739903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs.
    Strobach T; Liepelt R; Schubert T; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2012 Jan; 76(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 21360303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limitations in advance task preparation: switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons.
    Meiran N; Marciano H
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):540-50. PubMed ID: 12184555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cost of a voluntary task switch.
    Arrington CM; Logan GD
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):610-5. PubMed ID: 15327632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection.
    Lawo V; Fels J; Oberem J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2010-24. PubMed ID: 25248101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Voluntary task switching: chasing the elusive homunculus.
    Arrington CM; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):683-702. PubMed ID: 16060773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Episodic context binding in task switching: evidence from amnesia.
    Meier B; Rey-Mermet A; Woodward TS; Müri R; Gutbrod K
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):886-92. PubMed ID: 23395937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating task-set selection from task-set inhibition in the prefrontal cortex.
    Mayr U; Diedrichsen J; Ivry R; Keele SW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 16417679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional inertia and delayed orienting of spatial attention in task-switching.
    Longman CS; Lavric A; Munteanu C; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1580-602. PubMed ID: 24842065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bivalency effect: evidence for flexible adjustment of cognitive control.
    Rey-Mermet A; Meier B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):213-21. PubMed ID: 22060142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bivalency is costly: bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding.
    Woodward TS; Meier B; Tipper C; Graf P
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 14587170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task switching: the effect of task recency with dual- and single-affordance stimuli.
    Sumner P; Ahmed L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jul; 59(7):1255-76. PubMed ID: 16769624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.