235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18683853)
1. Do we truly see what we think we see? The role of cognitive bias in pathological interpretation.
Fandel TM; Pfnür M; Schäfer SC; Bacchetti P; Mast FW; Corinth C; Ansorge M; Melchior SW; Thüroff JW; Kirkpatrick CJ; Lehr HA
J Pathol; 2008 Oct; 216(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18683853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ki-67 in screen-detected, low-grade, low-stage prostate cancer, relation to prostate-specific antigen doubling time, Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy.
Khatami A; Hugosson J; Wang W; Damber JE
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 18949633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm.
Kronz JD; Silberman MA; Allsbrook WC; Epstein JI
Cancer; 2000 Oct; 89(8):1818-23. PubMed ID: 11042578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Errors in histological grading by prostatic needle biopsy specimens: frequency and predisposing factors.
Ruijter E; van Leenders G; Miller G; Debruyne F; van de Kaa C
J Pathol; 2000 Oct; 192(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 11004700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significant variations in nuclear structure occur between and within Gleason grading patterns 3, 4, and 5 determined by digital image analysis.
Veltri RW; Marlow C; Khan MA; Miller MC; Epstein JI; Partin AW
Prostate; 2007 Aug; 67(11):1202-10. PubMed ID: 17525934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate.
Jafari-Khouzani K; Soltanian-Zadeh H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 12814236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gleason grading of prostate cancer: level of concordance between pathologists at the University Hospital of the West Indies.
Coard KC; Freeman VL
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Sep; 122(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 15362366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does any correlation exist between the Gleason classification system and the computer-assisted microscope analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei features in human prostate adenocarcinoma?
Petein M; Decaestecker C; Segers V; Janssen T; Fourmarier M; Van Leer P; van Velthoven R; Schulman C; Pasteels JL; Kiss R
Anal Cell Pathol; 1996 Dec; 12(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 9025992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reproducibility of malignancy grading in prostatic cancers using the Gleason-Böckling system].
Kiss F; Lakner G; Csellár M; Nagy P; Tóth A; Vittay G
Orv Hetil; 1997 May; 138(19):1195-9. PubMed ID: 9235527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.
Helin H; Lundin M; Lundin J; Martikainen P; Tammela T; Helin H; van der Kwast T; Isola J
Hum Pathol; 2005 Apr; 36(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 15891999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Web-based tissue microarray image data analysis: initial validation testing through prostate cancer Gleason grading.
Bova GS; Parmigiani G; Epstein JI; Wheeler T; Mucci NR; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 11331959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the use of digital images for a national prostate core external quality assurance scheme.
Harnden P; Coleman D; Moss S; Kodikara S; Griffin NR; Melia J
Histopathology; 2011 Oct; 59(4):703-9. PubMed ID: 22014051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases.
Zhao J; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19033862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nuclear/Nucleolar morphometry and DNA image cytometry as a combined diagnostic tool in pathology of prostatic carcinoma.
Kavantzas N; Agapitos E; Lazaris AC; Pavlopoulos PM; Sofikitis N; Davaris P
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Dec; 20(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 11876548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
