BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18684642)

  • 1. Implicit learning for probable changes in a visual change detection task.
    Beck MR; Angelone BL; Levin DT; Peterson MS; Varakin DA
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1192-208. PubMed ID: 18684642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention, awareness of contingencies, and control in spatial localization: a qualitative difference approach.
    Vaquero JM; Fiacconi C; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1342-57. PubMed ID: 21038991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The change probability effect: incidental learning, adaptability, and shared visual working memory resources.
    van Lamsweerde AE; Beck MR
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1676-89. PubMed ID: 21963330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More learned irrelevance than perseveration errors in rule shifting in healthy subjects.
    Maes JH; Damen MD; Eling PA
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 15050775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Object discrimination by pigeons: effects of object color and shape.
    Lazareva OF; Vecera SP; Levin J; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2005 Apr; 69(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 15795067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential congruency effects in implicit sequence learning.
    Jiménez L; Lupiáñez J; Vaquero JM
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):690-700. PubMed ID: 19464194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both?
    Le Pelley ME; Suret MB; Beesley T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):312-27. PubMed ID: 19594278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape.
    Alexander T; Wilson SP; Wilson PN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):694-708. PubMed ID: 19379044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multidimensional visual statistical learning.
    Turk-Browne NB; Isola PJ; Scholl BJ; Treat TA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 18315414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Change detection evokes a Simon-like effect.
    Galfano G; Mazza V; Tamè L; Umiltà C; Turatto M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17573027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Object memory and change detection: dissociation as a function of visual and conceptual similarity.
    Yeh YY; Yang CT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 17466252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving postswitch performance in the dimensional change card-sorting task: the importance of the switch and of pretraining by redescribing the test cards.
    Mack W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Dec; 98(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 17599343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related brain potential evidence for implicit change detection: a replication of Fernandez-Duque et al. (2003).
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Ohira H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec; 448(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 18973794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implicit processing of tactile information: evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm.
    Pritchett D; Gallace A; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):534-46. PubMed ID: 21459622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of change detection.
    Shore DI; Burack JA; Miller D; Joseph S; Enns JT
    Dev Sci; 2006 Sep; 9(5):490-7. PubMed ID: 16911451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nature and processes of preverbal learning: implications from nine-month-old infants' discrimination problem solving.
    Coldren JT; Colombo J
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1994; 59(4):1-75; discussion 76-93. PubMed ID: 7997251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gradations of awareness in a modified sequence learning task.
    Norman E; Price MC; Duff SC; Mentzoni RA
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):809-37. PubMed ID: 17433717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.