242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18685820)
1. [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].
Müller-Deile J; Kortmann T; Hoppe U; Hessel H; Morsnowski A
HNO; 2009 Jun; 57(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 18685820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a comparative study.
Müller-Deile J; Kiefer J; Wyss J; Nicolai J; Battmer R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2008 Mar; 9(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 18300224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor.
Wolfe J; Neumann S; Marsh M; Schafer E; Lianos L; Gilden J; O'Neill L; Arkis P; Menapace C; Nel E; Jones M
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1181-90. PubMed ID: 26049314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvements in speech perception after the upgrade from the TEMPO+ to the OPUS 2 audio processor.
Seebens Y; Diller G
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 22094825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Rakszawski B; Wright R; Cadieux JH; Davidson LS; Brenner C
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 26905529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system.
Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children.
Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant.
Baudhuin J; Cadieux J; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Maxson JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):302-12. PubMed ID: 22533974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
Mosnier I; Marx M; Venail F; Loundon N; Roux-Vaillard S; Sterkers O
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 23408020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants. German version].
Lailach S; Lenz A; Zahnert T; Neudert M
HNO; 2023 Sep; 71(9):583-591. PubMed ID: 37540233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants.
Lailach S; Lenz A; Zahnert T; Neudert M
HNO; 2024 Jan; 72(Suppl 1):25-32. PubMed ID: 37656221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.
Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A multicentre comparative study of the ESPrit and the Nucleus 22].
Berger K; Bagus H; Michels H; Roth J; Voss B; Klenzner T
HNO; 2006 May; 54(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 16220284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
