These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18685880)
21. The Association of Pelvic Bone Mineral Density and With Proximal Femoral and Spine Bone Mineral Density in Post-menopausal Women. Mohseni M; Eisen S; Stum S; Civitelli R J Clin Densitom; 2022; 25(3):328-333. PubMed ID: 35177349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study. El-Kaissi S; Pasco JA; Henry MJ; Panahi S; Nicholson JG; Nicholson GC; Kotowicz MA Osteoporos Int; 2005 Oct; 16(10):1299-303. PubMed ID: 16082496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identify fracture-critical regions inside the proximal femur using statistical parametric mapping. Li W; Kornak J; Harris T; Keyak J; Li C; Lu Y; Cheng X; Lang T Bone; 2009 Apr; 44(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 19130910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls: a comparison between four different methods. Ekman A; Michaëlsson K; Petrén-Mallmin M; Ljunghall S; Mallmin H Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11315236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT). Bousson VD; Adams J; Engelke K; Aout M; Cohen-Solal M; Bergot C; Haguenauer D; Goldberg D; Champion K; Aksouh R; Vicaut E; Laredo JD J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Apr; 26(4):881-93. PubMed ID: 20939025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans. Bergot C; Bousson V; Meunier A; Laval-Jeantet M; Laredo JD Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jul; 13(7):542-50. PubMed ID: 12111014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age-related proximal femur bone mineral loss in South Indian women: a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry study. Anburajan M; Rethinasabapathi C; Korath MP; Ponnappa BG; Kumar KS; Panicker TM; Govindan A; Jagadeesan GN J Assoc Physicians India; 2001 Apr; 49():442-5. PubMed ID: 11762616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanxes discriminates osteoporotic women with vertebral but not with hip fracture. Gnudi S; Ripamonti C Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 15063517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture? Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of trabecular bone score and hip structural analysis with FRAX Bonaccorsi G; Fila E; Messina C; Maietti E; Ulivieri FM; Caudarella R; Greco P; Guglielmi G Aging Clin Exp Res; 2017 Oct; 29(5):951-957. PubMed ID: 27722900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of bone mineral density and hip geometry on the different types of hip fracture. Li Y; Lin J; Cai S; Yan L; Pan Y; Yao X; Zhuang H; Wang P; Zeng Y Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2016 Jan; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 26773177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey. Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk. Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study. Leslie WD; Martineau P; Bryanton M; Lix LM Osteoporos Int; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1445-1453. PubMed ID: 31016351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA]. Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of hip osteoporosis by DXA using a novel pulse-echo ultrasound device. Schousboe JT; Riekkinen O; Karjalainen J Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27492435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interpretation of hip fracture patterns using areal bone mineral density in the proximal femur. Hey HW; Sng WJ; Lim JL; Tan CS; Gan AT; Ng JH; Kagda FH Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Dec; 135(12):1647-53. PubMed ID: 26391986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of Singh Index and Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians as risk assessment tools of hip fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Liu Z; Gao H; Bai X; Zhao L; Li Y; Wang B J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Mar; 12(1):37. PubMed ID: 28253896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bone density and geometry in assessing hip fracture risk in post-menopausal women. Gnudi S; Sitta E; Fiumi N Br J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 80(959):893-7. PubMed ID: 17875597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures. Alenfeld FE; Wüster C; Funck C; Pereira-Lima JF; Fritz T; Meeder PJ; Ziegler R Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 9850344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]