These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18685880)
41. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice. Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The activity of a Spanish bone densitometry unit revisited under the point of view of FRAX. Gómez-Vaquero C; Bianchi M; Santo P; Roig-Vilaseca D; Narváez J; Nolla JM Reumatol Clin; 2012; 8(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 22608955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Pattern of fall and bone mineral density measurement in hip fractures. Goh JC; Bose K; Das De S Ann Acad Med Singap; 1996 Nov; 25(6):820-3. PubMed ID: 9055009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. Faulkner KG; Wacker WK; Barden HS; Simonelli C; Burke PK; Ragi S; Del Rio L Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 16447009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Correlation between Parameters of Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound and Hip Structural Analysis in Osteoporotic Fracture Patients. Zhang L; Lv H; Zheng H; Li M; Yin P; Peng Y; Gao Y; Zhang L; Tang P PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145879. PubMed ID: 26710123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Relationship between site-specific bone mineral density in the proximal femur and instability of proximal femoral fractures: A retrospective study. Kanazawa T; Ohmori T; Toda K; Ito Y Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 109(5):103496. PubMed ID: 36460291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Bone density reduction in various measurement sites in men and women with osteoporotic fractures of spine and hip: the European quantitation of osteoporosis study. Kröger H; Lunt M; Reeve J; Dequeker J; Adams JE; Birkenhager JC; Diaz Curiel M; Felsenberg D; Hyldstrup L; Kotzki P; Laval-Jeantet A; Lips P; Louis O; Perez Cano R; Reiners C; Ribot C; Ruegsegger P; Schneider P; Braillon P; Pearson J Calcif Tissue Int; 1999 Mar; 64(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 10024374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Improved performance of hip DXA using a novel region of interest in the upper part of the femoral neck: in vitro study using bone strength as a standard of reference. Boehm HF; Eckstein F; Wunderer C; Kuhn V; Lochmueller EM; Schreiber K; Mueller D; Rummeny EJ; Link TM J Clin Densitom; 2005; 8(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 16311437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events. Khoo BC; Lewis JR; Brown K; Prince RL Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 26282230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Trochanteric bone mineral density is associated with type of hip fracture in the elderly. Greenspan SL; Myers ER; Maitland LA; Kido TH; Krasnow MB; Hayes WC J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1889-94. PubMed ID: 7872054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures. Boonen S; Koutri R; Dequeker J; Aerssens J; Lowet G; Nijs J; Verbeke G; Lesaffre E; Geusens P J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1908-12. PubMed ID: 8619371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Hip fracture discrimination from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry by statistical model registration. Whitmarsh T; Fritscher KD; Humbert L; del Río Barquero LM; Roth T; Kammerlander C; Blauth M; Schubert R; Frangi AF Bone; 2012 Nov; 51(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 22959281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Patient-specific finite element estimated femur strength as a predictor of the risk of hip fracture: the effect of methodological determinants. Qasim M; Farinella G; Zhang J; Li X; Yang L; Eastell R; Viceconti M Osteoporos Int; 2016 Sep; 27(9):2815-2822. PubMed ID: 27108118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study. Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ex Vivo Evaluation of Hip Fracture Risk by Proximal Femur Geometry and Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Chinese Women. Yang XJ; Sang HX; Bai B; Ma XY; Xu C; Lei W; Zhang Y Med Sci Monit; 2018 Oct; 24():7438-7443. PubMed ID: 30334549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Random field assessment of inhomogeneous bone mineral density from DXA scans can enhance the differentiation between postmenopausal women with and without hip fractures. Dong XN; Pinninti R; Lowe T; Cussen P; Ballard JE; Di Paolo D; Shirvaikar M J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1043-51. PubMed ID: 25683520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Tibial or hip BMD predict clinical fracture risk equally well: results from a prospective study in 700 elderly Swiss women. Popp AW; Senn C; Franta O; Krieg MA; Perrelet R; Lippuner K Osteoporos Int; 2009 Aug; 20(8):1393-9. PubMed ID: 19096747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX. Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Women with hip fracture experience greater loss of geometric strength in the contralateral hip during the year following fracture than age-matched controls. Reider L; Beck TJ; Hochberg MC; Hawkes WG; Orwig D; YuYahiro JA; Hebel JR; Magaziner J; Osteoporos Int; 2010 May; 21(5):741-50. PubMed ID: 19572093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The accuracy of peripheral skeletal assessment at the radius in estimating femoral bone density as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a comparative study of single-photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Boonen S; Cheng X; Nicholson PH; Verbeke G; Broos P; Dequeker J J Intern Med; 1997 Oct; 242(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 9366811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]