148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18686352)
1. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improve the diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of adnexal malignancy?
Dai SY; Hata K; Inubashiri E; Kanenishi K; Shiota A; Ohno M; Yamamoto Y; Nishiyama Y; Ohkawa M; Hata T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Jun; 34(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 18686352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound for evaluation of adnexal malignancy: from 2D to 3D ultrasound.
Hata T; Hata K; Noguchi J; Kanenishi K; Shiota A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1255-68. PubMed ID: 21917077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal masses.
Haggerty AF; Hagemann AR; Chu C; Siegelman ES; Rubin SC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 25153677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional sonographic morphologic assessment in complex adnexal masses: preliminary experience.
Alcázar JL; Galán MJ; García-Manero M; Guerriero S
J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Mar; 22(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 12636324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contribution of power Doppler blood flow mapping to gray-scale ultrasound for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses in symptomatic and asymptomatic women.
Alcázar JL; Guerriero S; Laparte C; Ajossa S; Jurado M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Mar; 155(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 21211896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Torashima M; Hatanaka Y; Harada M; Higashida Y; Takahashi M; Mizutani H; Tashiro H; Iwamasa J; Miyazaki K
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 7824738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The use of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional color and power-Doppler in the diagnosis of blood flow indices of adnexal tumors].
Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2006 Apr; 77(4):296-306. PubMed ID: 16875035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guideline No. 403: Initial Investigation and Management of Adnexal Masses.
Salvador S; Scott S; Glanc P; Eiriksson L; Jang JH; Sebastianelli A; Dean E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Aug; 42(8):1021-1029.e3. PubMed ID: 32736853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ovarian cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criteria].
Marret H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Nov; 30(1 Suppl):S20-33. PubMed ID: 11917373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Sonographic diagnosis of presumed benign ovarian tumors].
Marret H; Cayrol M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):730-43. PubMed ID: 24200073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional ultrasound and three-dimensional power Doppler improve the preoperative evaluation of complex benign ovarian lesions.
Vrachnis N; Sifakis S; Samoli E; Kappou D; Pavlakis K; Iliodromiti Z; Botsis D
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 23444747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional power Doppler sonography for differentiation of adnexal masses.
Kupesic S; Kurjak A
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):452-8. PubMed ID: 10960641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced sonography in the examination of benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Ordén MR; Gudmundsson S; Kirkinen P
J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Nov; 19(11):783-8. PubMed ID: 11065267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Doppler with two-dimensional sonography and CA 125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses.
Schneider VL; Schneider A; Reed KL; Hatch KD
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):983-8. PubMed ID: 8497367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
