126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1868705)
1. Ultrasound B scanning with image analysis for assessment of allergic patch test reactions.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A; Pepe P; Giannetti A
Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Mar; 24(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 1868705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. B scanning evaluation of allergic reactions with binary transformation and image analysis.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 175():3-7. PubMed ID: 1502863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cutaneous reactivity to allergens at 24-h increases from the antecubital fossa to the wrist: an echographic evaluation by means of a new image analysis system.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Mar; 26(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 1505182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. B scanning evaluation of irritant reactions with binary transformation and image analysis.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 175():9-13. PubMed ID: 1502864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch test reactions to human dander in atopic dermatitis.
Uehara M; Ofuji S
Arch Dermatol; 1976 Jul; 112(7):951-4. PubMed ID: 938073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound for assessment of allergic and irritant patch test reactions.
Serup J; Staberg B
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Aug; 17(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 3308312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of erythema in irritant contact dermatitis. Comparison between visual scoring and laser Doppler flowmetry.
Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 2966711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quantification of patch test responses: a comparison between echographic and colorimetric methods.
Seidenari S; Belletti B
Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Sep; 78(5):364-6. PubMed ID: 9779256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound description and quantification of irritant reactions induced by dithranol at different concentrations. A comparison with visual assessment and colorimetric measurements.
Schiavi ME; Belletti B; Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Apr; 34(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 8730166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using laser-Doppler flowmetry and erythema index.
Gawkrodger DJ; McDonagh AJ; Wright AL
Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Mar; 24(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 1868699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of patch test reactions: a comparison between visual grading and erythema index image analysis.
Ohshima H; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Itoh M; Kanto H
Skin Res Technol; 2011 May; 17(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 21332805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Echographic evaluation with image analysis of irritant reactions induced by nonanoic acid and hydrochloric acid.
Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Sep; 31(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 7821005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using ImageJ.
Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Kanto H
Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24118475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple concomitant positive patch test reactions.
Mitchell JC
Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 606486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Echographic evaluation of corticosteroid inhibition of allergic patch test reactions.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Mar; 26(3):212-3. PubMed ID: 1505193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. IgE-mediated hypersensitivity and contact sensitivity to multiple environmental allergens in atopic dermatitis.
Tanaka M; Aiba S; Matsumura N; Aoyama H; Tabata N; Sekita Y; Tagami H
Arch Dermatol; 1994 Nov; 130(11):1393-401. PubMed ID: 7979440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
