126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1868705)
21. Papulo-vesicular count for the rating of allergic patch test reactions. A simple technique based on polysulfide rubber replica.
Peters K; Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol; 1987; 67(6):491-5. PubMed ID: 2451373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantification of cutaneous oedema in patch test reactions by measurement of skin thickness with high-frequency pulsed ultrasound.
Serup J; Staberg B; Klemp P
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Feb; 10(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 6713845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Noninvasive in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy is effective in differentiating allergic from nonallergic equivocal patch test reactions.
Slodownik D; Levi A; Lapidoth M; Ingber A; Horev L; Enk CD
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 30(3):1081-7. PubMed ID: 25604734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of area of application on the intensity of response to a cutaneous irritant.
Dykes PJ; Hill S; Marks R
Br J Dermatol; 1991 Oct; 125(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 1954121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.
Disphanurat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Dec; 93 Suppl 7():S7-14. PubMed ID: 21294394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pretreatment of the test area with 1-day occlusion improves the response rate to NiSO4 5% pet. patch tests in subjects with a positive history of nickel allergy.
Seidenari S; Manzini BM; Belletti B
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Sep; 33(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8565454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Skin tests for diagnostics of allergic immediate-type reactions. Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology].
Ruëff F; Bergmann KC; Brockow K; Fuchs T; Grübl A; Jung K; Klimek L; Müsken H; Pfaar O; Przybilla B; Sitter H; Wehrmann W;
Pneumologie; 2011 Aug; 65(8):484-95. PubMed ID: 21830178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Echographic evaluation of subclinical allergic patch test reactions.
Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Sep; 29(3):156-7. PubMed ID: 8222631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Allergy patch test reading from photographic images: disagreement on ICDRG grading but agreement on simplified tripartite reading.
Ivens U; Serup J; O'goshi K
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 17250541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The erythema Q-score, an imaging biomarker for redness in skin inflammation.
Frew J; Penzi L; Suarez-Farinas M; Garcet S; Brunner PM; Czarnowicki T; Kim J; Bottomley C; Finney R; Cueto I; Fuentes-Duculan J; Ohmatsu H; Lentini T; Yanofsky V; Krueger JG; Guttman-Yassky E; Gareau D
Exp Dermatol; 2021 Mar; 30(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 33113259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sesquiterpene lactone mix patch testing supplemented with dandelion extract in patients with allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis and non-allergic chronic inflammatory skin diseases.
Jovanović M; Poljacki M; Mimica-Dukić N; Boza P; Vujanović Lj; Duran V; Stojanović S
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 15479198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of patch test size and design on the distribution of erythema induced by sodium lauryl sulfate.
Nicholson M; Willis CM
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):264-7. PubMed ID: 10554060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Malajian D; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Aug; 69(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 23583066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A proposed relevance scoring system for positive allergic patch test reactions: practical implications and limitations.
Lachapelle JM
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jan; 36(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 9034686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of oral cortisone acetate on patch test reactions to eczematogenous contact allergens.
SULZBERGER MB; WITTEN VH; ZIMMERMAN EH
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1952; 32(29):343-52. PubMed ID: 12985164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick patch test results in 100 consecutive patients.
Lachapelle JM
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2914436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
