126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1868705)
41. Patients with atopic dermatitis have attenuated and distinct contact hypersensitivity responses to common allergens in skin.
Correa da Rosa J; Malajian D; Shemer A; Rozenblit M; Dhingra N; Czarnowicki T; Khattri S; Ungar B; Finney R; Xu H; Zheng X; Estrada YD; Peng X; Suárez-Fariñas M; Krueger JG; Guttman-Yassky E
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2015 Mar; 135(3):712-20. PubMed ID: 25583101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss, and laser Doppler velocimetry.
Freeman S; Maibach H
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Sep; 19(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 3049697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Patch testing with nickel sulfate: comparison between 2 nickel sulfate preparations and 2 different test sites on the back.
Simonetti V; Manzini BM; Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Oct; 39(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 9817224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens.
Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Nethercott JR; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1998 Jun; 38(6 Pt 1):911-8. PubMed ID: 9631997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Hyposensitization and desensitization in allergic contact dermatitis.
Abbas M; Hull PR
Dermatitis; 2012; 23(4):148-52. PubMed ID: 22828252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Delayed Allergic Reactions to Jellyfish Stings: Usefulness of Ultrasonographic Evaluation.
Giavedoni P; Velasco V; Morgado-Carrasco D; Nogué S; Mascaró Galy JM
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Nov; 37(11):2721-2724. PubMed ID: 29603311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Aeroallergen patch testing for patients presenting to contact dermatitis clinics.
Whitmore SE; Sherertz EF; Belsito DV; Maibach HI; Nethercott JR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1996 Nov; 35(5 Pt 1):700-4. PubMed ID: 8912564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A single exposure of solar simulated radiation suppresses contact hypersensitivity responses both locally and systemically in humans: quantitative studies with high-frequency ultrasound.
Kelly DA; Walker SL; McGregor JM; Young AR
J Photochem Photobiol B; 1998 Jul; 44(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 9757595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Patch testing in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis.
Mortazavi H; Ehsani A; Sajjadi SS; Aghazadeh N; Arian E
BMC Dermatol; 2016 Jul; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 27405224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. High-frequency ultrasound measurement of patch test reactions.
Brazier S; Shaw S
Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Oct; 15(4):199-201. PubMed ID: 3542369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008.
Fransway AF; Zug KA; Belsito DV; Deleo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM; Dekoven J; Zirwas M
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 23340394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential.
Usmani N; Wilkinson SM
Clin Exp Allergy; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1541-6. PubMed ID: 17883733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America--1984 to 1985.
Storrs FJ; Rosenthal LE; Adams RM; Clendenning W; Emmett EA; Fisher AA; Larsen WG; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Schorr WF
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 20(6):1038-45. PubMed ID: 2754054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination.
McLelland J; Shuster S
Br J Dermatol; 1990 May; 122(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 2354115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of methods for the macroscopic assessment of epicutaneous allergic contact reactions in guinea pigs.
Przybilla B; Ring J; Schmid JG
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Oct; 11(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 6499425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Echographic evaluation with image analysis of normal skin: variations according to age and sex.
Seidenari S; Pagnoni A; Di Nardo A; Giannetti A
Skin Pharmacol; 1994; 7(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 8024801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Contact allergy to aeroallergens in children with atopic dermatitis: comparison with allergic contact dermatitis.
Cabon N; Ducombs G; Mortureux P; Perromat M; Taieb A
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jul; 35(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 8896951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The prevalence of allergic contact sensitization in a general population in Tromsø, Norway.
Dotterud LK
Int J Circumpolar Health; 2007 Sep; 66(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 18018846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
