These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1868705)

  • 81. The role of vehicles in diagnostic patch testing. A reappraisal.
    Tanglertsampan C; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Oct; 29(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8281777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. The disturbance of epidermal barrier function in atopy patch test reactions in atopic eczema.
    Gfesser M; Rakoski J; Ring J
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Oct; 135(4):560-5. PubMed ID: 8915146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. The case of a very late response to a contact allergen in patch testing.
    Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2004; 59(1):444-8. PubMed ID: 16146028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Studies of new short-period method for delayed contact hypersensitivity assay in the guinea pig. (2). Studies of the enhancement effect of cyclophosphamide.
    Kashima R; Oyake Y; Okada J; Ikeda Y
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Jul; 29(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 8365149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Patch testing: what allergists should know.
    White JM
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2012 Feb; 42(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22092850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).
    Wentworth AB; Yiannias JA; Keeling JH; Hall MR; Camilleri MJ; Drage LA; Torgerson RR; Fett DD; Prakash AV; Scalf LA; Allen EM; Johnson JS; Singh N; Nordberg Linehan DL; Killian JM; Davis MD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 70(2):269-75.e4. PubMed ID: 24268786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Contact hypersensitivity in adolescents.
    Pap EB; Temesvári E; Németh I; Sárdy M; Pónyai G
    Pediatr Dermatol; 2018 Nov; 35(6):769-773. PubMed ID: 30152547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Quantitative ultrasonic methods for characterization of skin lesions in vivo.
    Raju BI; Swindells KJ; Gonzalez S; Srinivasan MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 29(6):825-38. PubMed ID: 12837498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. A new image analysis system for the assessment of allergic patch test reactions recorded by B scanning.
    Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Nov; 25(5):329. PubMed ID: 1809539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Allergic contact dermatitis from gardenia fruit.
    Kubo Y; Nonaka S; Yoshida H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Feb; 22(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 2323204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Objective prick test evaluation: non-invasive techniques.
    Berardesca E; Gabba P; Nume A; Rabbiosi G; Maibach HI
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1992 Aug; 72(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 1357879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. 20 MHz sonography, colorimetry and image analysis in the evaluation of psoriasis vulgaris.
    Hoffmann K; Dirschka T; Schwarze H; el-Gammal S; Matthes U; Hoffmann A; Altmeyer P
    J Dermatol Sci; 1995 Mar; 9(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 7772572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Reading patch tests on day 7.
    Saino M; Rivara GP; Guarrera M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 May; 32(5):312-3. PubMed ID: 7634794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. High-frequency sonography combined with image analysis: a noninvasive objective method for skin evaluation and description.
    Seidenari S
    Clin Dermatol; 1995; 13(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 8665443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Echographic evaluation of patch test inhibition by oral antihistamine.
    Motolese A; Ferdani G; Manzini BM; Seidenari S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Apr; 32(4):250-1. PubMed ID: 7600792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Evaluation of patch test reactions by evaporimetry and colorimetry.
    Brusi C; Giorgini S; Francalanci S; Gola M; Sertoli A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Sep; 31(3):187-8. PubMed ID: 7821018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Wound assessment.
    Young S
    Br J Community Nurs; 2019 Sep; 24(Sup9):S5. PubMed ID: 31479330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Skin imaging: state of the art at the dawn of the year 2000.
    Corcuff P; Piérard GE
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 1998; 26():1-11. PubMed ID: 9597310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Ultrasound B scanning with image analysis for assessment of allergic patch test reactions.
    Seidenari S; Di Nardo A; Pepe P; Giannetti A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Mar; 24(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 1868705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. B scanning evaluation of allergic reactions with binary transformation and image analysis.
    Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 175():3-7. PubMed ID: 1502863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.