394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18687288)
1. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a sequence of tests.
Thompson ML
Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12925502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1237-56. PubMed ID: 12111876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study.
Warren R; Hayes C; Pointon L; Hoff R; Gilbert FJ; Padhani AR; Rubin C; Kaplan G; Raza K; Wilkinson L; Hall-Craggs M; Kessar P; Rankin S; Dixon AK; Walsh J; Turnbull L; Britton P; Sinnatamby R; Easton D; Thompson D; Lakhani SR; Leach MO;
Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(7):917-29. PubMed ID: 16916709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Commentary on "Alternative graphs for diagnostic tests: the agreement chart and the receiver operating characteristic curve".
Goldsmith C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):855-6. PubMed ID: 18687286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement.
Michener LA; Walsworth MK; Doukas WC; Murphy KP
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11):1898-903. PubMed ID: 19887215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can you handle the truth (and know it when you see it)? Understanding sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and ROC curves.
Cotter K; Peipert JF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 16213422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
Hand DJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistics review 13: receiver operating characteristic curves.
Bewick V; Cheek L; Ball J
Crit Care; 2004 Dec; 8(6):508-12. PubMed ID: 15566624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity and specificity of a visual acuity screening protocol performed with the Lea Symbols 15-line folding distance chart in preschool children.
Bertuzzi F; Orsoni JG; Porta MR; Paliaga GP; Miglior S
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Dec; 84(6):807-11. PubMed ID: 17083543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
Obuchowski NA
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
