393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18687942)
1. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
Price AR
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plagiarism erodes scientific integrity.
Clouthier SG
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5631):311-2. PubMed ID: 12869743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
Klein DF
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns.
Shalev M
Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Plagiarize or perish?
Ready T
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ORI defended.
Price AR
Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6560):11. PubMed ID: 8538729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research ethics. Planned misconduct surveys meet stiff resistance.
Holden C
Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5598):1549. PubMed ID: 12446890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Out of sight, out of mind: how Harvard University exploited rural Chinese villagers for their DNA.
Keim B
Genewatch; 2003; 16(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 15025121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Inquiry into misconduct excoriates Michigan State.
Maddox J
Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6410):287. PubMed ID: 8426641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fraud in scientific publishing.
Scully C; Baum B
Oral Dis; 2006 Jul; 12(4):357. PubMed ID: 16792718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy.
Kornfeld DS
Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 22622208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Baylor backed over 'falsified data' claims.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Apr; 386(6627):747. PubMed ID: 9126718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
