393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18687942)
21. Policing integrity.
Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. What is truth? Standards of scientific integrity in American Heart Association journals.
Miano JM
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2010 Jan; 30(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20018938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
Steinberg NA
South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Plagiarism and misconduct in scientific publishing.
Jones DS
J Pharm Pharmacol; 2009 May; 61(5):539. PubMed ID: 19405991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Scientific misconduct. The multiple repercussions of a fudged grant application.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5616):40. PubMed ID: 12677036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Fellow scientists begin to get suspicious about data.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Oct; 16(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The dark side of scientific research.
McDonald JC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 16772306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Fed Regist; 2005 May; 70(94):28369-400. PubMed ID: 15898182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publishing].
Overbeke AJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Sep; 138(36):1822-6. PubMed ID: 7935910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Scientific misconduct. Former Hwang colleague faked monkey data, U.S. says.
Holden C
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5810):317. PubMed ID: 17234923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Collateral damage.
Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7310):1023. PubMed ID: 20739963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Plagiarism and biomedical publishing.
Caelleigh AS
Acad Med; 1994 Jan; 69(1):34. PubMed ID: 8285992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Arizona professor files lawsuit after being fired for misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):817. PubMed ID: 9732854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) was no help.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 16789306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Federal agency says researcher misled colleagues and institutional administrators.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 11833568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Incarceration, restitution, and lifetime debarment: legal consequences of scientific misconduct in the Eric Poehlman case: Commentary on: "Scientific forensics: how the office of research integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review".
Tilden SJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):737-41. PubMed ID: 20842537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
Marshall E
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Science and business. DeCODE adds plagiarism allegation to its case.
Marshall E
Science; 2006 Oct; 314(5799):580. PubMed ID: 17068232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. What should the standard of proof be in scientific misconduct proceedings relating to public health service-funded research?
Spece RG; Marchalonis J
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2003 Jun; 49(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 12899448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Your own desktop crime lab.
Powell K
Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):493. PubMed ID: 16675984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
