123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18687973)
1. Methods to assess dermal exposures in occupational settings: a scoping review.
Therkorn JH; Mathewson BA; Laursen CJ; Maberti S; Aizenberg V; Dinkelacker BT; Rege S
Ann Work Expo Health; 2024 Apr; 68(4):351-365. PubMed ID: 38466914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does industry take the susceptible subpopulation of asthmatic individuals into consideration when setting derived no-effect levels?
Johansson MK; Johanson G; Öberg M; Schenk L
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Nov; 36(11):1379-91. PubMed ID: 27283874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Role of Number Notation: Sign-Value Notation Number Processing is Easier than Place-Value.
Krajcsi A; Szabó E
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():463. PubMed ID: 23181035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vitro Human Dermal Absorption Studies on Pesticides in Complex Mixtures: Investigation of Guidance Criteria and Possible Impact Parameters.
Pieper C; Engel N; Wend K; Kneuer C; Martin S
Toxics; 2024 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 38668471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Approaches for evaluating the relevance of multiroute exposures in establishing guideline values for drinking water contaminants.
Krishnan K; Carrier R
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2008; 26(3):300-16. PubMed ID: 18781539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Criteria for skin notation in different countries.
Nielsen JB; Grandjean P
Am J Ind Med; 2004 Mar; 45(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 14991854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro dermal absorption rate testing of certain chemicals of interest to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration: summary and evaluation of USEPA's mandated testing.
Fasano WJ; McDougal JN
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 18501488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assignment of skin notation for maximum allowable concentration (MAC) list in Poland.
Czerczak S; Kupczewska M
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Mar; 17(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 11871755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Web-based Tool to Aid the Identification of Chemicals Potentially Posing a Health Risk through Percutaneous Exposure.
Gorman Ng M; Milon A; Vernez D; Lavoué J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Apr; 60(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 26721263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of indices proposed as criteria for assigning skin notation.
Lavoué J; Milon A; Droz PO
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Nov; 52(8):747-56. PubMed ID: 18687973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing workplace chemical exposures: the role of exposure monitoring.
Harper M
J Environ Monit; 2004 May; 6(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 15152307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
