333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18691260)
1. Genetic diversity revealed in human faces.
Lie HC; Rhodes G; Simmons LW
Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2473-86. PubMed ID: 18691260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.
Rhodes G
Annu Rev Psychol; 2006; 57():199-226. PubMed ID: 16318594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MHC, mate choice and heterozygote advantage in a wild social primate.
Huchard E; Knapp LA; Wang J; Raymond M; Cowlishaw G
Mol Ecol; 2010 Jun; 19(12):2545-61. PubMed ID: 20492522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality?
Peters M; Rhodes G; Simmons LW
J Evol Biol; 2008 Mar; 21(2):572-9. PubMed ID: 18179518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the peacock's train an honest signal of genetic quality at the major histocompatibility complex?
Hale ML; Verduijn MH; Møller AP; Wolff K; Petrie M
J Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 22(6):1284-94. PubMed ID: 19453370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness.
Komori M; Kawamura S; Ishihara S
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):862-9. PubMed ID: 19285521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?
Komori M; Kawamura S; Ishihara S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 19394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans.
Roberts SC; Little AC; Gosling LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI; Carter V; Petrie M
Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 17148217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces.
Zaidel DW; Aarde SM; Baig K
Brain Cogn; 2005 Apr; 57(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 15780460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness.
Cellerino A
J Endocrinol Invest; 2003; 26(3 Suppl):45-8. PubMed ID: 12834020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women.
Baudouin JY; Tiberghien G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Nov; 117(3):313-32. PubMed ID: 15500809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout - females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity.
Forsberg LA; Dannewitz J; Petersson E; Grahn M
J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 17714303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Condition-dependent mate choice and a reproductive disadvantage for MHC-divergent male tiger salamanders.
Bos DH; Williams RN; Gopurenko D; Bulut Z; DeWoody JA
Mol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 18(15):3307-15. PubMed ID: 19508451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preference for facial self-resemblance and attractiveness in human mate choice.
Kocsor F; Rezneki R; Juhász S; Bereczkei T
Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 21267643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli.
Rennels JL; Bronstad PM; Langlois JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):884-93. PubMed ID: 18665733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Opposites attract: MHC-associated mate choice in a polygynous primate.
Setchell JM; Charpentier MJ; Abbott KM; Wickings EJ; Knapp LA
J Evol Biol; 2010 Jan; 23(1):136-48. PubMed ID: 19891747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness.
Valenzano DR; Mennucci A; Tartarelli G; Cellerino A
Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1282-91. PubMed ID: 16356527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens).
Penton-Voak IS; Little AC; Jones BC; Burt DM; Tiddeman BP; Perrett DI
J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 14498802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MHC-dependent survival in a wild population: evidence for hidden genetic benefits gained through extra-pair fertilizations.
Brouwer L; Barr I; van de Pol M; Burke T; Komdeur J; Richardson DS
Mol Ecol; 2010 Aug; 19(16):3444-55. PubMed ID: 20670363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
