BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18691758)

  • 1. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
    Fox DR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.
    Aldenberg T; Jaworska JS
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 May; 46(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10805987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competing statistical methods for the fitting of normal species sensitivity distributions: recommendations for practitioners.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1232-43. PubMed ID: 22050459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More noise does not mean more precision: A review of Aldenberg and Rorije (2013).
    Fox DR
    Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Sep; 43(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 26375888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ecological risk of anthropogenic pollutants to reptiles: Evaluating assumptions of sensitivity and exposure.
    Weir SM; Suski JG; Salice CJ
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Dec; 158(12):3596-606. PubMed ID: 20855139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of wildlife hazard levels using interspecies correlation models and standard laboratory rodent toxicity data.
    Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Barron MG
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(24):1604-9. PubMed ID: 20077235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Framework for traits-based assessment in ecotoxicology.
    Rubach MN; Ashauer R; Buchwalter DB; De Lange H; Hamer M; Preuss TG; Töpke K; Maund SJ
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Apr; 7(2):172-86. PubMed ID: 20981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing uncertainty in environmental risk assessment (ERA): clearly defining acute and chronic toxicity tests.
    Hahn T; Stauber J; Dobson S; Howe P; Kielhorn J; Koennecker G; Diamond J; Lee-Steere C; Schneider U; Sugaya Y; Taylor K; Van Dam R; Mangelsdorf I
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 19132815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 15th International Symposium on Toxicity Assessment : new directions in ecotoxicology and meeting the challenges ahead.
    Au DW
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Aug; 19(7):2463-4. PubMed ID: 22678546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative estimation of uncertainty in human risk analysis.
    Sassi G; Vernai AM; Ruggeri B
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun; 145(1-2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17175099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 10th Anniversary Critical Review: The tissue-residue approach for toxicity assessment: concepts, issues, application, and recommendations.
    Meador JP; McCarty LS; Escher BI; Adams WJ
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Dec; 10(12):1486-98. PubMed ID: 19037491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
    Schneider K; Schuhmacher-Wolz U; Hassauer M; Darschnik S; Elmshäuser E; Mosbach-Schulz O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Results of analysis of ratios of indices of toxic and sensory effect of chemicals].
    Novikov SM; Shashina TA
    Gig Sanit; 2013; (6):78-80. PubMed ID: 24624828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of science-based uncertainty factors in noncancer risk assessment.
    Dourson ML; Felter SP; Robinson D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Oct; 24(2 Pt 1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8933624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
    Gottschalk F; Nowack B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From individual to population level effects of toxicants in the tubicifid Branchiura sowerbyi using threshold effect models in a Bayesian framework.
    Ducrot V; Billoir E; Péry AR; Garric J; Charles S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3566-71. PubMed ID: 20380436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing uncertainty of risk estimates for mixtures of chemicals within regulatory constraints.
    Putzrath RM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Feb; 31(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 10715223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the integration of hormesis and essentiality into ecotoxicology now opening Pandora's Box?
    Kefford BJ; Zalizniak L; Warne MS; Nugegoda D
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Feb; 151(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 17559995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Summing nondetects: incorporating low-level contaminants in risk assessment.
    Helsel DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 20821699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.