265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18691758)
21. Ecotoxicity test methods and environmental hazard assessment for engineered nanoparticles.
Crane M; Handy RD; Garrod J; Owen R
Ecotoxicology; 2008 Jul; 17(5):421-37. PubMed ID: 18438709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data.
Aldenberg T; Slob W
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1993 Feb; 25(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 7682918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Uncertainty evaluation of human risk analysis (HRA) of chemicals by multiple exposure routes.
Sassi G; Ruggeri B
Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1343-56. PubMed ID: 18684163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ecotoxicity of paint mixtures: comparison between measured and calculated toxicity.
Gade AL; Heiaas H; Lillicrap A; Hylland K
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Oct; 435-436():526-40. PubMed ID: 22892347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Towards optimization of chemical testing under REACH: a Bayesian network approach to Integrated Testing Strategies.
Jaworska J; Gabbert S; Aldenberg T
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010; 57(2-3):157-67. PubMed ID: 20156511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Species Sensitivity Distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data.
Aldenberg T; Rorije E
Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 23614542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physiological modes of action across species and toxicants: the key to predictive ecotoxicology.
Ashauer R; Jager T
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29090718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On the use of hierarchical probabilistic models for characterizing and managing uncertainty in risk/safety assessment.
Kodell RL; Chen JJ
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 17511709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Statistical uncertainty in hazardous terrestrial concentrations estimated with aquatic ecotoxicity data.
Golsteijn L; van Zelm R; Hendriks AJ; Huijbregts MA
Chemosphere; 2013 Sep; 93(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 23735489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bayesian methods for uncertainty factor application for derivation of reference values.
Simon TW; Zhu Y; Dourson ML; Beck NB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():9-24. PubMed ID: 27211295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: reproductive and endocrine effects.
Pohl HR; Luukinen B; Holler JS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 15921838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set.
Schaafsma G; Kroese ED; Tielemans EL; Van de Sandt JJ; Van Leeuwen CJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 19061930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nanomaterial health effects part 3: conclusion--hazardous issues and the precautionary principle.
Kanarek MS
WMJ; 2007 Feb; 106(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 17393752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. General unified threshold model of survival--a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology.
Jager T; Albert C; Preuss TG; Ashauer R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):2529-40. PubMed ID: 21366215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of environmental consequence index (ECI) using fuzzy composite programming.
Arunraj NS; Maiti J
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Feb; 162(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 18619733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An intelligent data collection tool for chemical safety/risk assessment.
Verdonck FA; Van Sprang PA; Vanrolleghem PA
Chemosphere; 2008 Feb; 70(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17959222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bad habits die hard: the NOEC's persistence reflects poorly on ecotoxicology.
Jager T
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Feb; 31(2):228-9. PubMed ID: 22095471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method.
Sorgog K; Kamo M
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Nov; 183():109494. PubMed ID: 31376805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tracking toxicants: toward a life cycle aware risk assessment.
Kuczenski B; Geyer R; Boughton B
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 20977239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
