These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18691758)

  • 101. Ecological interactions affecting population-level responses to chemical stress in Mesocyclops leuckarti.
    Kulkarni D; Hommen U; Schäffer A; Preuss TG
    Chemosphere; 2014 Oct; 112():340-7. PubMed ID: 25048925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Assessment factors for extrapolation from short-time to chronic exposure--are the REACH guidelines adequate?
    Malkiewicz K; Hansson SO; Rudén C
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Oct; 190(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19540321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. [Criteria, rules and procedures adopted by IARC in evaluating risks from different carcinogenic agents for humans].
    IARC
    Vopr Onkol; 2007; 53(6):621-41. PubMed ID: 18416130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. Regulatory aspects of genotoxicity testing: from hazard identification to risk assessment.
    Blakey D; Galloway SM; Kirkland DJ; MacGregor JT
    Mutat Res; 2008 Nov; 657(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 18926925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. Taking Multiple Exposure Into Account Can Improve Assessment of Chemical Risks.
    Clerc F; Bertrand NJH; La Rocca B
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Dec; 62(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 29095991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. Proposing a vigorous hybrid of the LOEC and ECx.
    deBruyn AM; Elphick JR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):345-7. PubMed ID: 23529808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. Modeling exposure to persistent chemicals in hazard and risk assessment.
    Cowan-Ellsberry CE; McLachlan MS; Arnot JA; Macleod M; McKone TE; Wania F
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):662-79. PubMed ID: 19552503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. (Q)SARs to predict environmental toxicities: current status and future needs.
    Cronin MT
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 28243641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. What to do with NOECS/NOELS--prohibition or innovation?
    Fox DR; Billoir E; Charles S; Delignette-Muller ML; Lopes C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):764-6. PubMed ID: 22987523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Time-dependent species sensitivity distributions.
    Fox DR; Billoir E
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Feb; 32(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 23161611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Use of a novel battery of bioassays for the biological characterisation of hazardous wastes.
    Pablos MV; Fernández C; del Mar Babín M; María Navas J; Carbonell G; Martini F; García-Hortigüela P; Vicente Tarazona J
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Jul; 72(5):1594-600. PubMed ID: 19217160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. Comment on Fox et al. (2012): What to do with NOECs/NOELs.
    Landis WG
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):766-7. PubMed ID: 22987524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. Uncertainty characterization approaches for risk assessment of DBPs in drinking water: a review.
    Chowdhury S; Champagne P; McLellan PJ
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1680-91. PubMed ID: 19167150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. Chemical and ecotoxicological characterization of solid residues produced during the co-pyrolysis of plastics and pine biomass.
    Bernardo MS; Lapa N; Barbosa R; Gonçalves M; Mendes B; Pinto F; Gulyurtlu I
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(1):309-17. PubMed ID: 19118946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Reluctant comment on Fox et al. (2012): On being dragged into the NOEC squabble.
    Newman MC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):767. PubMed ID: 22987525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. NOEC: notable oversight of enlightened Canadians: a response to van Dam et al. (2012).
    Van der Vliet L; Taylor LN; Scroggins R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):397-8; author reply 399-400. PubMed ID: 22707418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches.
    Moermond C; Beasley A; Breton R; Junghans M; Laskowski R; Solomon K; Zahner H
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):640-651. PubMed ID: 27869364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. Subsea release of oil from a riser: an ecological risk assessment.
    Nazir M; Khan F; Amyotte P; Sadiq R
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1173-96. PubMed ID: 18844861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. Extrapolating ecotoxicological measures from small data sets.
    Pennington DW
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2003 Oct; 56(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 12927555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Nanomaterials in ecotoxicology.
    Scott-Fordsmand JJ; Krogh PH; Lead JR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Jan; 4(1):126-8. PubMed ID: 17994909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.